Search for: "Jones v. No Named Respondent" Results 401 - 420 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
If you've ever studied partnerships or limited liability companies, chances are you know of Professor Larry Ribstein, the Mildred Van Voorhis Jones Chair in Law at the University of Illinois College of Law. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm by Ken
Blogger Josephine Jones compiled a list both his threats and the responses to them and commentary on them. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Barrett was named a professor of law at the school in 2010; four years later, she became the Diane and M.O. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
A recent Mother Jones headline aptly summarizes one potential line of attack: “How Brett Kavanaugh Could Cripple the Next Democratic President. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But with those names, the group wants to deliver would-be supporters’ email addresses and phone numbers to DeSantis. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Broadly speaking, Ontario has already identified the necessary steps, namely pleading, discovery and disposition, the problems lay chiefly with the implementation. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's our Summary of Argument: Beauty pageants, true to their name, are "theatrical production[s]"[1] that aim to convey a particular viewpoint about beauty, femininity, or identity. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Marty Lederman
In any event, it's not obvious that this statute implicates that concern, because the ACA does not create such a duty: If there is someone out there who does not already maintain insurance and who has a moral or other objection to "go[ing] into commerce" just yet (i.e., before that person "goes into commerce" to consume health care), section 5000A gives that person an alternative means of satisfying the legal obligation--namely, by making a "shared… [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
  Police responded by taking pictures for their families. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]