Search for: "Just v. Chambers" Results 401 - 420 of 2,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am by Ronald Collins
And finally, he would have made it very clear that these rules applied to all speakers or publishers, not just to the news media. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:47 pm by Michael Froomkin
 In his chambers and in his court room I saw the best that the U.S. legal system has to offer. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am by Anton Metlitsky
 He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 1:32 pm by Giles Peaker
Robertson v Webb, Re Honley Road (LANDLORD & TENANT – rent determination) (2018) UKUT 235 (LC) Just a brief note on this – where a landlord serves a notice of proposed increased rent under section 13 Housing Act 1988, the tenant can apply for a determination of the rent to be charged by the First Tier Tribunal. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
Awad v Hooley CHI/21UD/HMG/2020/0003 5 August 2020 (link to PDF) This is a First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decision on an application for a Rent Repayment Order (RRO), which unusually deals with the issue of the tenant’s rent arrears. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 6:01 am by Giles Peaker
Rakusen v Jepson & Ors, Safer Renting Intervenor (2021) EWCA Civ 1150 This is the Court of Appeal judgment on an appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) appeal (our report here). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm by familoo
This is a guest blog post by Christopher Sharp QC, barrister and Head of Family Practice Group at St John’s Chambers. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:21 am by Jon Hyman
Arlen Bean of the 8th District Court of Appeals in Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:31 pm
Surely this will just provoke more litigation as to how that discretion should be exercised? [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
When they were published in the article, they were, as the passages just quoted from the judgment show, and as the journalists must have appreciated, no more than unsubstantiated unchecked accusations, from an unknown source, coupled with speculation. [read post]