Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Kerr is critical of affording the state a margin of appreciation where it has not properly evaluated the issues at stake. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
Here is the opinion in Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) On September 30, Judge Doherty of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana handed down a decision in Vidrine v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) Having read Judge Reinhardt’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:45 pm
That happened, for example, in INS v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:35 am
(Orin Kerr) Justice Kagan’s opinion this morning in Caraco v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Kerr v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:07 am
The district court had dismissed the case on the grounds that the auditor, who received relevant information from an employee of the State of Louisiana, was not the “original source” of the information on which the claim was based. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
Shea blogged here about State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:39 am
In People v Nappo (94 NY2d 564 [2000]), we held that the State was not the “owner” of uncollected taxes within the meaning of the statutory definition of the term because “taxes due were not the property of the State prior to their remittance” (id. at 566). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:27 am
Lady Hale and Lord Kerr both gave dissenting judgments (Lady Hale as to outcome, though she agreed with Lord Wilson on the relevant legal principles to be applied; Lord Kerr dissented both on outcome and on the legal approach taken, specifically on the relevant test to be applied by the courts when considering the proportionality of a measure; though both agreed with certain parts of Lord Wilson’s judgment). [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 7:30 am
And with the Ninth Circuit's decision on July 5 in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
(Orin Kerr) The Supreme Court may answer that question in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
At the same time that the individual mandate was being enacted in Congress, the Supreme Court heard a very signifiicant case on the Necessary and Proper Clause, United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 10:57 am
Jones & Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:44 am
Here’s the abstract: In the Supreme Court’s recent decision on GPS monitoring, United States v. [read post]
