Search for: "LAWS v. FISHER" Results 401 - 420 of 2,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm by David Cosgrove
Many investment advisers, such as SEC registered Investment Adviser Fisher Investments, use a boilerplate JAMS commercial arbitration clause in their Account Agreements (“LOA”) with customers that include a Delaware choice-of-law provision. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:57 am by Amy Howe
Supreme Court to uphold affirmative action in university admissions in” Fisher v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 3:24 pm by Guest Author
Raimondo, a case where commercial fishers are challenging an agency’s statutory authority to issue a regulation requiring the fishers to pay the wages of inspectors on their boats. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by Elie Mystal
If we look at the Baylor Law raw data, we can really see what this affirmative action debate is all about… Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Admissions, Affirmative Action, Baylor, Baylor Law, Baylor Law School, Baylor University Law School, Black, Fisher v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
The National Law Journal just ran a story on a new effort to get the Supreme Court to re-visit its decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
The litigation was initially filed by franchise law attorneys in Hamilton County Superior Court under Cause No. 29D03-1609-PL-008343 on behalf of Plaintiffs Britt Interactive, LLC and TownePost Network, Inc. of Fishers, Indiana. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
At New Private Law, Greg Klass continues his analysis of DIRECTV v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:48 am by Randall Hodgkinson
DavisImproper instruction on premeditationImproper ordering of lesser-included offense instructionsFailure to give voluntary manslaughter instructionRetroactive application of new hard-50 law violates Ex Post Facto ClauseState v. [read post]