Search for: "LIBERTY CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION"
Results 401 - 420
of 661
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
Quarterman argues he has a liberty interest in the individualized treatment available in juvenile court. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, and the author of God vs. the Gavel: The Perils of Extreme Religious Liberty and Justice Denied: What America Must Do to Protect Its Children. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The plain language also seems to say, though, that it doesn’t protect murderers, which would be bad news for Miller. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 8:56 pm
Regarding child labor, as I’ve pointed out before the Supreme Court actually unanimously upheld state child labor regulations against a liberty of contract challenge. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:07 am
The decision whether or not to have a child is complex and deeply personal. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:23 pm
On January 14, 2014, Erick sued the hospital, asking the court to declare that TADA does not apply to Marlise, who is dead, or, in the alternative event that the court finds that Marlise is alive, that TADA violates her 14th Amendment liberty rights to liberty and equal protection under the law, and asking the court to order the immediate removal of the ventilator. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:18 pm
The Supreme Court issued opinions on cases involving Proposition 8 and DOMA, ruling not only that “DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment” but also reinstating same-sex marriage in California. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
We’ve lost our center, a core sense of beliefs that unite, and anxiety grips the land. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
SSHD, Lord Kerr stated, “in reaching decisions that will affect a child, a primacy of importance must be accorded to his or her best interests. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
SSHD, Lord Kerr stated, “in reaching decisions that will affect a child, a primacy of importance must be accorded to his or her best interests. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 1:08 pm
Yesterday, the Digital Media Law Project joined an all-star cast of organizations (including the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Kentucky, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Center for Democracy & Technology, the Public Participation Project, and Wendy Seltzer and Adam Holland of Chilling Effects) in filing an amicus brief in Jones v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
In the words of American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
Eckert to the Gila Regional Medical Center for doctors to go spelunking in his innards, eventually sedating him so they could so so. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
It is a recipe for intolerance, self-centered practices, and, ultimately, if permitted to fester, religious war. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:36 am
Work to protect consumers, ranging from child product safety to financial security to the safety of hazardous waste facilities, will cease. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 1:13 pm
The Florida Civil Commitment Center (FCCC) , located in Arcadia, has been criticized because treatment is lacking (less than 5 hours per week), it lacks security (several incidents of murder on site, riots requiring hundreds of officers to control), there is no method of restoring civil liberties (the program has no release stage), being underfunded, understaffed and located in an old condemned correctional facility. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:34 am
A child whose mother can read is 50% more likely to live past age 5! [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:23 pm
Furthermore, the litigation asserts that Veronica, as an “Indian child” under the Indian Child Welfare Act, has a federally protected right to have the state courts fully consider and appropriately weigh her best interests as an Indian child. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Many of the reasons center not on Constitutional principles or prior law, but rather a fundamentalist version of Biblical doctrine. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
It is a neutral principle, grounded in core Due Process Clause values: protection of normative expectations about marital and family privacy (if a state can’t take away your child without due process, how can it take away your spouse?) [read post]
