Search for: "LITTLE v. HOLDER" Results 401 - 420 of 1,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2015, 4:53 am by Paul Rosenzweig
The most salient case on point is Holder v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:17 am
At page 10 the Court of Appeal's judgment in The Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2009] EWCA Civ 90 is provided as an example of the application of the public interest test under the FOIA. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:58 am
At page 10 the Court of Appeal's judgment in The Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2009] EWCA Civ 90 is provided as an example of the application of the public interest test under the FOIA. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 1:02 am
  A previous order had been approved against Google back in May, which identified the two ISPs as the holders of the information. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Small rights holders constantly say that federal litigation is incredibly costly, discovery is monumental, the whole process is way too expensive and unaffordable to the most vulnerable participants: small rights holders are priced out of the market. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:04 pm
Perhaps the most famous case is Video Pipeline Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 8:28 am by Ben
Circuit Has recently faced in the dispute between Spanski Enterprises v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm by Larry
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:01 pm by Kerry Sheehan
Copyright holders in that case argued that ISPs, like Cox (Cox was not part of the CAS) should cut off subscribers’ Internet access on the basis of copyright holders’ mere allegations of infringement. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 5:56 am by Unknown
The parties agreed to a settlement that would reallocate the ownership of AMC’s equity between common stockholders and APE holders, with a little more going to the common stockholders to compensate for the APEs’ dilutive effect. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:06 am by Ben
I think there needs to be a little more calm in this discussion."" [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:09 pm
  Many times people forget that step, which can save a lot of time and grief.Then it draws a sliding scale of effort required based on factors such as the likelihood of finding the rights holder, the age of the work, the status of the creator (professional/amateur), and the proposed distribution of the work (narrow, easy takedown v. widespread distribution). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:10 pm
  Many times people forget that step, which can save a lot of time and grief.Then it draws a sliding scale of effort required based on factors such as the likelihood of finding the rights holder, the age of the work, the status of the creator (professional/amateur), and the proposed distribution of the work (narrow, easy takedown v. widespread distribution). [read post]