Search for: "LITTLE v. TERRITORY"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
The Control Board and the DOJ counter saying that the Board members are local territorial officers. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
Our take Although the first CJEU judgment would appear to put an end to the French data protection authority’s absolutist vision of the territorial scope of the right to be forgotten, the detail is somewhat different. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am
In interpreting EU law, the CJEU found that the EU legislature had not chosen to give individuals data protection rights that extend in scope beyond the territory of the Member States. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:48 am
Both case results stem from the Federal Circuit’s decision in Click-to-Call Technologies, L.P. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 8:35 am
A recent case before the Human Rights Committee, Portillo Caceres v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
Or, at least, the G7 Declaration and China's response a little-observed dimension of the emerging mode of governance. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:53 am
White Hall Pharmacy LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am
Luckily (or unluckily) the CJEU has finally handed down its judgment very recently.As a short primer, the case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider‑Esleben concerned the song "Metall auf Metall" created by the band Kraftwerk, which comprises of the respondents Hütter and Schneider‑Esleben. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am
Luckily (or unluckily) the CJEU has finally handed down its judgment very recently.As a short primer, the case of Pelham GmbH v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider‑Esleben concerned the song "Metall auf Metall" created by the band Kraftwerk, which comprises of the respondents Hütter and Schneider‑Esleben. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Supporters of decriminalization argue that criminalization is unnecessary, given that immigration violations already carry civil penalties, and that prosecutions under § 1325 waste government resources, allow for abusive use of prosecutorial power and do little to deter undocumented crossings. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am
Rather, the test to be applied was that outlined in Lawson v Serco [2006] UKHL 3 and subsequent cases, namely whether normal rules on territoriality (that the Respondent was based outside the UK and so outside the scope of the ERA) were capable of being displaced by the strength of connection with Great Britain and British employment law. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:34 pm
I thought I’d do a little research and quickly find the answers. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 6:54 pm
The case, Garvey v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:22 am
In any case, following the success of Baker v. [read post]
