Search for: "LJ" Results 401 - 420 of 2,404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Open micJanis Pilch, Rutgers U: domestically it seems obvious that litigation on 512 can’t change the systemic problem of infringement and the impossibility for most rightsholders to litigate. 512 sets up a permanent conflict b/t service providers and rightsholders. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jonathan Band Library Copyright Alliance: Motherless & Mavrix show problems with moderation –including compliance w/new EU rules—threatening to remove safe harbor.Sofia Castillo Association of American Publishers: still bad.Stephen Carlisle Nova Southeastern University: has one client, a small music publisher, and can’t keep stuff down. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm by INFORRM
Sharp LJ stated that: “The issue is not whether we would have come to the same or a different conclusion had we been trying the case at first instance. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:56 am by Jon L. Gelman
See, “As long as the State has a process that recognizes the statutory framework of the offset provisions under section 224 of the Act, its application and procedures for addressing the triennial redetermination process under 22470 is within State jurisdiction and not subject to Federal review,” Letter G Sklar to LJ Crider, 12/10/2004, 38 NJPRAC Appendix E, p.473 (Thomson-Reuters 2018). [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am by UKSC Blog
The Court of Appeal, composed of Kitchin LJ, Floyd LJ and Lewison LJ allowed the appeal on the ground of obviousness, and declared the ‘181 Patent invalid [2017] EWCA Civ 1671. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
The Government’s White Paper on online harms was due to be published on 25 March 2019 but has been delayed. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:22 am
This morning, the UK Supreme Court delivered its decision in Actavis v ICOS [2019] USKC 15, upholding the Court of Appeal's decision that ICOS's dosage regimen patent was obvious. [read post]
On 27 February 2019 the Supreme Court gave judgment in the appeal brought by the widow of the Belfast solicitor, Pat Finucane, against the refusal of the Secretary for State for Northern Ireland to hold a public inquiry into her husband’s death. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
On 30 July 2018, the Supreme Court gave an important judgment in relation to whether it was always necessary to go to court to approve the withdrawal of treatment for someone who was in a prolonged state of unconsciousness. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:16 am by ASAD KHAN
(ii) Disposal In his dissenting judgment, Elias LJ had pointed out numerous problems with the UT’s reasons for rejecting KV’s account of torture. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Instead, they concurred with Elias LJ’s position that the majority had erred by holding that Dr Zapata-Bravo had exceeded the proper limit of his role in the manner alleged. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:07 am
[and] in Ashai Medical v Macopharma [2002] EWCA Civ 466 (as per Aldous LJ at [21]). [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
On 9 March 2019 the House of Lords Communications Committed published its report “Regulating in a Digital World” concluding that the digital world needs a different approach to regulation. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It approved the view of Elias LJ in the Court of Appeal, that very considerable weight should be given to the fact that injuries which are self inflicted by proxy are likely to be extremely rare. [read post]