Search for: "Laboratory Express, Inc." Results 401 - 420 of 438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46)   Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (IP tango), China: Pfizer loses trade mark action against Jaingsu Lianhuan Pharmaceutical Co over 3D mark: (Rouse & Co International), India: More patents for new forms issued to generics: (Patent Circle), India: Gauri Kamath on drug ‘differential pricing’ in India: (Spicy IP), Mexico: Revised health supplies regulations promise changes for generics: (International Law Office), US: World drug pricing crisis: Congressmen criticise US Trade Representative over Special 301… [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
– Discussion of  T Berg’s paper ‘IP and the preferential option for the poor’: (ISinIP), Patent valuation: differing analytical methods: (Hal Wegner) Global - Copyright Copyright as an engine of free expression? [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 471 U.S. 707 (1985), in particular, could have been taken straight out of our inaugural post. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Class 46) Global - Patents Valuing patents: discussion on Malte Kollner’s Intellectual Asset Management Magazine article ‘The journey is the reward’: (IP finance), Indigenous groups express concern on IP protection of their knowledge: (Intellectual Property Watch), Eco-patent commons – what’s going on? [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
" Id. at 513 (concurring and dissenting opinion).Sure, Lohr involved express medical device preemption, but the issue of what is "different from" an FDA requirement isn't all that far from the implied preemption question of whether there's a "conflict" with an FDA action. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: (IPBiz),State of the Union address 28 Jan 2008: statement regarding patenting human life: (IPBiz), (Patently-O),Alnylam Pharmaceuticals secures UK patent covering molecules that affect RNA interference: (SmartBrief),Doha style compulsory licences for exports: The politics…: (Spicy IP),Pushing to compulsory licensing: Pharma companies heading closer to Doha: (Spicy IP),Financial Express on the battle between big pharma companies and the… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:24 pm
BPMC alleges that DHS performs laboratory services, and induces others to perform services, that infringe the ‘693 patent. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 3:19 am
Federal Laboratories Corporation et alfiled 01/10/07 1:07-cv-00273Aquascape Designs, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:36 pm
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 10, 2008 DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
filed 03/22/07 1:07-cv-01721 Abbott Laboratories et al v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:44 am
"; in order for a licensee to have co-plaintiff standing, it must hold "at least some" of the proprietary rights under the patent; "[b]ecause the trial court erred by dismissing Mitutoyo's willful infringement claim and including HFTUSA's sales in the royalty base, but rendered a proper judgment in all other respects, we affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part, and remand"Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al. v. [read post]