Search for: "Lancaster v. Lancaster" Results 401 - 420 of 482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Duh. - ECJ ruling in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG (IPKat) (Managing IP) Frisdranken/Red Bull dispute is referred to ECJ: Frisdranken Industrie Winters v Red Bull GmbH (Class 46) A serious reference or is somebody winding us up? [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:11 am
A few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the much-awaited decision Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, C-230/16. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
 The IPKat thanks David Lancaster (Rouse Legal) for this note. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Famous Trials 1 v. (193?) [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:45 am by Máiréad Enright
It has been used by several administrations, including in the George Fox 6 case at Lancaster in 2006. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Support Group Phone: (803) 733-5425 Autism The Autism and Special Needs Fund of Lancaster P.O. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Al mes siguiente también siguió la misma suerte el caso que, por accidente, ganaría el primer lugar en el rótulo: Brown v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:43 am by Victoria Kwan
” Breyer agreed, pointing to the aftermath of Bush v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:13 pm by John A. Gallagher
, the circumstances under which coverage may lapse);(v) The employee's status as a key employee and the potential consequence that restoration may be denied following FMLA leave, explaining the conditions required for such denial (see§ 825.218);(vi) The employee's rights to maintenance of benefits during the FMLA leave and restoration to the same or an equivalent job upon return from FMLA leave (see§§ 825.214 and 825.604);… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 Lancaster, 390 S.W.2d at 221; Kroger Co., 387 S.W.2d at 626; Roberts at 871. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:12 am by Joseph L. Hyde
Lancaster, 385 N.C. 459, 469 (2023) (rule does not require rote recitation of the elements); with State v. [read post]