Search for: "Lancaster v. Lancaster"
Results 401 - 420
of 527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
law, Articles 5 to 7 of Directive 89/104 effect a complete harmonisation of the rules relating to the rights conferred by a trade mark and accordingly define the rights of proprietors of trade marks in the Union.The question referred to the ECJ by the Oberlandesgericht Nürnberg in Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH v Simex Trading AG was whether perfume testers, the packaging of which bears the information that the product is intended for advertising purposes and not for… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL HISTORY Miracle Star, owned and operated by Jeffrey and Staretta Moffatt, provides drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation services at a location in Lancaster, California. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:57 am
Regina v Lancaster Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The jury had to decide on the facts of the case whether an omission in a claim form was significant. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:15 am
In the case, Scottsdale Insurance Company v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:45 pm
District Court Judge Donovan Frank has rejected a handful of motions brought by the defendants in this First Amendment Establishment Clause case brought by by the American Civil Liberties Union (represented pro bono by Dorsey & Whitney, led by Peter Lancaster). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:19 am
" Judkins v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:48 pm
Employee Job Loyalty Can Impact Your Business - Marylee Abrams of Abrams & Schmidt on the firm's Minnesota Labor & Employment Law Blog Employers Incur Risk if they Pursue Action Against an Employee for Off-Duty Web Comments - Texas lawyer Tom Crane on his San Antonio Employment Law Blog Justice Sotomayor Exercises Judicial Restraint In Shady Grove v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:04 am
Hace unos días se hizo público que unos científicos de la Universidad de Lancaster anunciaban el control del teléfono móvil con el cerebro. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:16 am
Regina v Lancaster [2010] EWCA Crim 370; [2010] WLR (D) 63 “Where a person was charged with an offence of falsifying a document made or required for an accounting purpose, by omitting a material particular from that document, contrary to s 17 of the Theft Act 1968, the omitted particular was to be regarded as material if it had the effect that the document was liable to mislead in a way which was significant, or in a way which mattered. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:41 am
Supreme Court W (Children), Re (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 12 (03 March 2010) Lewis, R (on the application of) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2010] UKSC 11 (03 March 2010) Martin v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2010] UKSC 10 (03 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R v W [2010] EWCA Crim 372 (02 March 2010) NW, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 404 (03 March 2010) Costello v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 371 (02 March 2010) Lancaster,… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:03 am
Lancaster of the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
Leroy V, Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:55 pm
Weissburg v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:25 pm
You may read the opinion in State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 11:48 am
Derr v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:51 am
In Lancaster General Hospital v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:32 pm
Earlier: Lawsuit of the Day: Lancaster v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm
It's also worth noting that Lancaster's complaint against Seyfarth does not delve into the merits of Blanks v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 1:34 am
George Runner, R-Lancaster, who sponsored California’s initiative, said the law improves monitoring because it requires all registered felony sex offenders to wear a GPS device. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
