Search for: "Landmark Insurance Company"
Results 401 - 420
of 651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 12:50 am
Your agreement to proceed with this insurance transaction shall constitute your consent to the receipt of commission by the Company. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 7:15 am
The Commonwealth touts the bill as a landmark consumer protection bill, noting that “a policy may not be cancelled on the basis of age or deterioration of mental or physical health; a long-term care policy may not contain a provision containing a new preexisting condition limitation period when existing coverage is converted to a new one within the same insurance company; the policy may not provide coverage for skilled nursing care only; or provide… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:25 am
Improving Access to Healthcare and Education Putting health care within reach: President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act to stop insurance companies from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions or disabilities. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:25 am
Improving Access to Healthcare and Education Putting health care within reach: President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act to stop insurance companies from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions or disabilities. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:22 am
Landmark American Insurance Company, No. 11-P-747 (Mass. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:49 pm
The insurance director has announced a settlement with Aetna Life Insurance Company. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 1:32 pm
See Our Related Blog Posts: State Supreme Court Rules Against Insurers in Landmark Environmental Case MetLife Settles with States for Almost $500 Million [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the warnings violate the tobacco companies' First Amendment rights. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the warnings violate the tobacco companies' First Amendment rights. [read post]
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Expands Scope of Workers Compensation Liability for "Statutory Employers"
13 Sep 2012, 1:06 pm
In a landmark decision that effectively overrules approximately thirty years of precedent, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently expanded “statutory employer” status to any company that subcontracts for services or work “of a kind which is a regular or recurrent part of the entity’s business. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:36 pm
The question is why has the Justice Department not been building criminal cases against companies for violating Sarbanes-Oxley - the landmark corporate reform law enacted after Enron? [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
UNIT 82 JOINT VENTURE, FIVE STAR HOLDING COMPANY, INC., FIVE STAR HOLDING MANAGEMENT, L.L. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 11:49 am
The state collected about $150 million in insurance money but was entitled to much more and fought with the insurance companies in court over this. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:51 am
It also allows you to e-mail an accident report to yourself and your insurance company. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
This new double standard makes it very easy for auto insurance companies to allege fraud and void coverage against their own customers, but makes it near impossible for innocent customers to turn around and allege fraud when an insurance company cheats, lies and steals against the unsuspecting, the innocent and the vulnerable. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:55 am
This new double standard makes it very easy for auto insurance companies to allege fraud and void coverage against their own customers, but makes it near impossible for innocent customers to turn around and allege fraud when an insurance company cheats, lies and steals against the unsuspecting, the innocent and the vulnerable. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
In its landmark decision, written by Chief Judge John Roberts, the Court upheld the mandate by a 5-4 vote. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:16 am
Workers’ compensation insurance is a powerful and often necessary tool for employers. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
This is especially so where the main contract may contain provisions such as liquidated damages, an arbitration clause and other specific provisions with respect to security, insurance and removal of liens which may be wholly suitable to the owner and contractor, but totally unsuitable to the subcontractor. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
Rick In a landmark decision, the First Circuit Court of Appeals held in Patco Construction Company, Inc. v. [read post]
