Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 401 - 420
of 16,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
But in the context of anti-suit or anti-enforcement injunctions, it is impossible to shoehorn the cross-border implications of the relief into a hypothetical proceeding that is purely domestic. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am
Last month, in Flor v Greenberg Farrow Architectural Inc., a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division handed down an opinion with important lessons for business owners and practitioners in states that have adopted the Revised Uniform LLC Act, such as New Jersey, as well as in states that haven’t, such as New York. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm
In view of the apparent contradictions caused by a growing number of complex cross-cutting, cross-boundary and cross-cultural phenomena, such as artificial intelligence, climate change or zoonotic diseases, the time may have come again to rethink and transcend the dualisms that guided human thinking for a long time creating wide gaps between not only law and law, but also between law and other scientific areas? [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
For instance, we know he grew up in Bristol, England and got involved in the underground street art there in the 1990s.[1] In an effort to evade the police, the artist began going by a pseudonym, first going by Robin Banx, later shortening it to Banksy (this was easier to write quickly on a wall).[2] When he was 18, he realized stencils were a faster method that would allow him to make a quick getaway from law enforcement. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am
There will no doubt be Jewish men who will not be able to wear their skullcaps and a few Christians of both sexes who will not be able to wear a cross in their lapels, but they will be a small minority – the overwhelming number of those affected will be female Muslims. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
Raich—(a terrible federalism decision holding that Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce authorizes a ban on the possession of marijuana that never crossed state lines or was sold in any commercial transaction)—and Kelo v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:30 pm
The post Case Review – Darwin Construction (BC) Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 3:06 pm
The post Calistoga Ranch Owner, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:53 pm
That is precisely what happened in Calistoga Ranch Owner, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:25 pm
No, said the Florida Supreme Court today in City of Tallahassee v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
The Delaware District Court’s Ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment in the case of Thomson Reuters v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 5:07 am
Sulier v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
This summary also includes: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; CFCE Determinations; Other legal issues; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
Taylor (1908), Currin v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am
Heller is a partner in the firm’s Family Law practice, based in its Morristown, NJ office. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
” “”A release is a contract, and its construction is governed by contract law” (Schiller v Guthrie, 102 AD3d 852, 853 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cardinal Holdings, Ltd. v Indotronix Intl. [read post]
