Search for: "Law v. McLaughlin" Results 401 - 420 of 474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this racial harassment case filed by the parents of a young boy who was ridiculed at school because of his race, the Court of Appeals allows some claims to proceed to trial but grants qualified immunity to some school officials who were not on notice that certain physical harassment violated the Constitution.The case is DiStiso v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:20 am by SHG
  Apparently, County of Riverside v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:10 am
The New York Times, December 5, 2009 Saturday, Late Edition - Final, Section A; Column 0; Metropolitan Desk; Pg. 15, 876 words, Mayor v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
And based on the court’s analysis of the pre-Rule 430B law, it dismissed with prejudice the Section 11 claims against defendant McLaughlin, see id., at 14-15.Download PDF file of In re Countrywide Financial [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 11:24 pm
Some agencies require informed consent to get DNA, but it's legal to lie to get DNA samples, DNA in someone's trashcan is fair game, and you don't need probable cause to take a DNA sample under current law, the gathering was told in a seminar titled DNA 101.The legal eagles among you may be interested that the Supreme Court recently granted cert (meaning they agreed to hear the case) in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:44 am by Quinta Jurecic
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is hearing oral arguments at 2:30pm today in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
The injunction should provide procedural protections that are at least as strong as those provided by constitutionally valid criminal libel laws Second, an anti-libel injunction is like a tiny criminal libel law, just for this defendant as to these statements about this plaintiff: The injunction would make it a crime for McLaughlin to say certain libelous things about Knight, on pain of prosecution for criminal contempt. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 3:56 am by Russell Jackson
Plaintiffs argued that an issue class certification under Rule 23(c)(4) was justified, but Magistrate Judge McCarthy -- citing the Second Circuit's seminal decision in McLaughlin v. [read post]