Search for: "Leah Litman"
Results 401 - 420
of 477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
(Part I)" Leah Litman has this post at the "Take Care" blog. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 8:45 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman and Helen Klein Murillo argue that the Supreme Court’s decisions in three cases from the last 15 years – Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:27 am
Laws like PASPA – and there are others (my essay and an article by Leah Litman each provide examples) – illustrate the mischief a broad understanding of equal sovereignty could cause. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 4:16 am
Of course, Josh could just ask Leah Litman, because she knows stuff and hates Trump almost as much as Larry Tribe, so she can surely be trusted. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 11:00 am
.'" You can access today's new episode of the "First Mondays" podcast, featuring Dan Epps and guest host Leah Litman, via this link. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 5:40 am
On the latest edition of our summer series, “In Recess,” Dan Epps and official guest host Leah Litman (filling in for Ian Samuel, who is enjoying a Croatian vacation) get you up to speed on what has been happening at the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:21 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman argues that the Supreme Court’s scheduling of the oral argument in the entry-ban cases for the second week, rather than the first week, of the October session “might be further evidence of what several commentators identified in the Supreme Court’s June 26 decision and order—an inclination to never decide the case on its merits. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman takes issue with each of the government’s arguments in favor of its restrictive interpretation of the Supreme Court’s order. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:18 am
In her contribution to this symposium, Leah Litman writes that “it’s likely we’ve already heard the court’s last and only words (which were no words at all) on the merits [of the travel ban] . [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:49 am
Leah Litman is an assistant professor at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
Kruger of the Supreme Court of California; Leah Litman, UCI Law; and Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:42 am
Kruger of the Supreme Court of California; Leah Litman, UCI Law; and Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:45 am
Several commentators have already skewered this part of the administration’s policy in detail, including Marty Lederman, Leah Litman, and Amir Ali. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am
” Additional commentary on the guidelines comes from Adam Cox and Ryan Goodman at Just Security, Leah Litman at Take Care, and Marty Lederman at Just Security here and here. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
Commentary on today’s travel-ban ruling comes from Dara Lind and Tara Golshan of Vox; Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress; Marty Lederman for Just Security; and Leah Litman of Take Care Blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am
At Take Care, Leah Litman maintains that “it doesn’t really matter whether the President issued the clarifying memorandum in response to the injunctions or possibility of mootness,” and that the “key point—and the problem for the administration—is that the entry procedures are not now, and perhaps were never formally linked to the government’s review of its entry procedures. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman highlights an amicus brief opposing the government’s motion to freeze the injunctions preventing implementation of the entry ban; “the brief argues that the entry ban violates the Establishment Clause’s prohibition on animus toward particular religions. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am
” At Take Care, Steve Vladeck and Leah Litman maintain that two developments on Wednesday in the entry-ban cases “de-couple the entry ban from the internal review procedures—and, in doing so, undermine (perhaps fatally) the government’s strongest arguments for the ban itself. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
" And at the "Take Care" blog, Steve Vladeck and Leah Litman have a post titled "How the President's Clarifying Memorandum Destroys the Case for the Entry Ban. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 4:31 am
At Take Care, Leah Litman assesses the implications of the extension, arguing that “the President has now formally severed the link between the government’s review of its internal visa procedures and the entry ban itself,” and that “[a]s a result, the government has undermined its own oft-repeated rationale for the order: imposing a temporary bar on entry while it studied the issue and considered more comprehensive vetting procedures” and has… [read post]
