Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure"
Results 401 - 420
of 672
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 5:39 pm
Key to that formula is whether I characterize my travel as sometimes/often/mostly “business,” “visiting friends or relatives,” or “vacation or leisure”. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:17 am
" The Illinois Supreme Court analyzed this legal quandry in the case of Boub v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:01 pm
Boub v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:29 pm
"The Illinois Supreme Court analyzed this legal quandry in the case of Boub v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:09 am
In April 2009, HICL entered into administration and the ship was sold to the claimant, All Leisure Holidays Limited (ALHL). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
To be sure, the Court very likely will decide this case, Perry v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am
– practical ramifications of ECJ’s decision in MPS v Murphy and FAPL v QC Leisure (1709 Copyright Blog) Levies for private copying when blank media are imported: who pays? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
This includes coverage of the law school's recent seminar, chaired by Sir Robin Jacob, on the controversial ECJ rulings in FA Premier League v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:51 pm
Look at the cost of living in an area, the climate and leisure trends. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am
In offering our group complaint about Law, Liberty, and Leisure, our bias toward the latter is clear. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:53 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Daventry District Council v Daventry & District Housing Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1153 (13 October 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Woodland v The Swimming Teachers’ Association & Ors [2011] EWHC 2631 (QB) (17 October 2011) High Court (Commercial Court) All Leisure Holidays Ltd v Europaische Reiseversicherung AG & Ors [2011] EWHC 2629 (Comm) (17 October 2011) High Court (Patents Court) Generics (UK)… [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:14 am
EU free trade and copyright laws allow use of foreign decoders in pubs, rules ECJ: Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure / ??????????????????????????????? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
You will be given this questionnaire at your consultation and can fill it out at your leisure. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:12 am
legalweek Last week the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) gave its preliminary ruling in two joined cases, FA Premier League v QC Leisure and others and Murphy v Media Protection Services (click here for the judgment). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
(China Law Blog) The US and other western democracies still enjoy huge advantages over China (IAM) Europe Parliament Committee urges EU Commission to support Print Disabilities Treaty (IP Watch) EPO, European Commission renew commitment to unitary patent (IP Watch) EU free trade and copyright laws allow use of foreign decoders in pubs, rules ECJ: Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure (Out-Law) (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat) (IP Watch) Andale OHIM! [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling access to… [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd October 4, 2011 System of licences for broadcasting football matches which grants broadcasters territorial exclusivity on a Member State basis and prohibits television viewers from watching broadcasts with decoder card in other Member States is contrary to EU law. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
They held that such a prohibition cannot be justified either in light of the objective of protecting intellectual property rights or by the objective of encouraging the public to attend football stadiums.Judgment in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:10 am
., v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
Now drinkers can enjoy the IPKat's football prowess via Greek decoders Breathlessly back on the blog after this morning's envigorating copyright and trade mark law training session with a bright and bushy-tailed batch of trainees, this Kat now turns to the main news of the moment, today's momentous ruling of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David… [read post]
