Search for: "Light v. Light" Results 401 - 420 of 41,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2007, 5:31 am
Last Thursday evening I attended an excellent seminar, arranged by my Local Law Society, upon the property rights of unmarried couples in the light of the House of Lords' decision in Stack v Dowden. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:01 am by Paul Karlsgodt
David Waller, my partner at Baker Hostetler and hospitality lawyer extraordinaire, posted an entry in the firm’s Hospitality Lawg yesterday entitled AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:58 pm
The plaintiffs in Altria v, Good, 501 F. 3d 29 (1st Cir. 2007) alleged that Phillip Morris violated state laws prohibiting fraudulent misrepresentation in its false promotions and advertising for Marlboro and Cambridge Lights as "Light" with "Lowered Tar and Nicotine" when in fact the "Light" cigarettes would not deliver any less tar or nicotine to the smoker. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:56 am by Daily Record Staff
State, 446 Md. 610 (2016), remanding the case for further consideration in light of Ray-Simmons & McGouldrick v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:47 pm
Despite a well-deserved reputation for rigorous reasonableness review after Booker, the Eighth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:59 am by texasbar
John Albach's "End of the World" contributions that appeared in the January 2000 column spawned two contributions of unusual, but very "nice" contract provisions:(1) From Jack Hazlewood of Amarillo, who years ago "happened to stumble on to Roy Rogers' contract with his movie studio (or maybe his agent)" in Nichols Encyclopedia of Legal Forms, this clause buried "deep in the fine print":Actor [Roy Rogers] shall never in performance to which he is… [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by texasbar
John Albach's "End of the World" contributions that appeared in the January 2000 column spawned two contributions of unusual, but very "nice" contract provisions:(1) From Jack Hazlewood of Amarillo, who years ago "happened to stumble on to Roy Rogers' contract with his movie studio (or maybe his agent)" in Nichols Encyclopedia of Legal Forms, this clause buried "deep in the fine print":Actor [Roy Rogers] shall never in performance to which he is… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:55 am by John M. Rogitz
On June 7, 2018, the USPTO issued new guidance to its examining corps in the form of a memorandum discussing the Federal Circuit’s April 13, 2018 decision in Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Glenn Reynolds
WISCONSIN JUDGE RULES STATE CONCEALED-WEAPON BAN UNCONSTITUTIONAL: “In light of the landmark Supreme Court ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:34 am by Holger Hembach
In Colon v The Netherlands, the European Court of Human Rights has scrutinized laws authorizing the search of persons without reasonable suspicion in light of article 8 ECHR.Pursuant to Dutch law, the mayor (Burgomaster) may designate certain areas as ‘security risk area’ for a limited time. [read post]