Search for: "Livings v. Davis" Results 401 - 420 of 1,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" The second segment discusses a Texas death penalty case, Ayestas v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Davis, which involves the standards for government-funded investigations to establish an indigent defendant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and Wilson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:45 pm
Strangers, like Carol Davis and Mr. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(See an earlier podcast segment on the topic.)Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Front-end and back-end solutions.Death and TexasUS Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ayestas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 Syria has six world heritage sites, and al-Azm related that every Syrian lives on top of an archaeological site, near a site, or within a stone's throw of a site.Archaeological site looting in Apamea, 2012.Why is cultural heritage protection important in Syria? [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” For the UC Davis Law Review Online, John Mills discusses the Arizona capital-sentencing statute at issue in the pending cert petition in Hidalgo v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Jordan’s Housing Allocations and Homelessness by Luba and Davies and this one. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 4:23 am by SHG
This comes from the 2001 guidance issued in the waning hours of the Clinton administration, except it’s a misquote of the Supreme Court’s test in Davis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Kahn flagged Judge Cooper’s latest opinion in United States v. [read post]