Search for: "Long v. Arnold" Results 401 - 420 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Sama, and Jennifer Wieboldt, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Tags: Cross-border transactions, Morrison v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
And in early December, Justice Woolford dismissed the long-running case of Wu v Moncur. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Arnold & Porter is among the counsel to the plaintiffs in this case.] [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
  Reserved Judgments Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) Smith v Backhouse, heard on 11 July 2023 (Asplin, Arnold and [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand On 15 February 2019 a judgment was handed down in the long running case of Bloomfield v Slater [2019] NZHC 171 – making public a previous interlocutory judgment in the “Whale Oil” blogger case. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:17 am
Although 1709 Blog readers did not agree with this proposition, in his judgment in SAS v WPL, Arnold J [at para 27] held that: "In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Seven months later, however, Congress reversed the decision with a rider to an appropriations bill, and the old practice continued.CWK helped found the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) in 1936, testified before Congress on behalf of its immigration committee, and remained a member long after prominent liberals, including Thurman Arnold, Jerome Frank, and Robert H. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
This follows a near 20-year-long campaign for the right to broadcast sentencing. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In Regeneron v Kymab (IPKat post here), a patent was found enabled and thus sufficiently disclosed despite the example methods provided in the specification being unworkable at the time of the invention. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:18 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Next it was Aparajita’s turn to come up with an incisive case review of Lupin Ltd. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
 Because the Regulation merely limited the "use" of trade marks they did not strip away the trade mark owner;s right to prevent or exclude others from using their mark (citing Arnold J in Pinterest v Premium Interest). [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 3:29 pm by Graham Smith
Last week's CJEU Svensson v Retriever decision has established some important points about the legality of linking under EU copyright law:A clickable direct link to a copyright work made freely available on the internet with the authority of the copyright holder does not infringe. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
It seems to follow, although this is not very clear in the judgment, that a link to an infringing copy does not infringe if, and for so long as, a copy of the same work is freely available somewhere on the internet with the authority of the copyright holder. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Arnold & Porter, 756 A.2d 427, 435 (D.C. 2000).Private industry standardization codes - Mutual Casualty Co. v. [read post]