Search for: "Long v. Director of Revenue" Results 401 - 420 of 565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Proposed Classes to be discussed: 7B. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Peter Rost
Rost was a Vice President, Marketing and Managing Director for Wyeth, responsible for the Nordic region in Europe.Dr. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am by William McGrath
The Act defines an EGC as a company with annual gross revenues of less than $1 billion during its most recent fiscal year. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:59 am by William Carleton
Titles V & VI These titles increase the number of shareholders a private company may have and still remain private. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
The IPO market is characterized not only by legal requirements but also market realities and long-standing customs. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 26, 2012 issuance of its unanimous opinion in the Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
Where the claimant exploited the confidential information by granting licences to others, and his licence revenue had been diminished as a result of the breach, he could recover the lost revenue. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:48 am by William McGrath
The cases appear to be the first of their kind relating to the purchase of shares in the pre-IPO market.In the federal court case, SEC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
The IPKat wishes that Woolley had been persuaded at an early stage, on discovering the existence of an almost identical mark, to do something more decisive than tolerating its existence so long as some licensing revenue was heading his way. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
Stanford International Bank Ltd (acting by its joint liquidators) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, heard 23 – 25 January 2012. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
In the case of Gram Panchayat & Anr. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
It amends the Internal Revenue Code to provide that a non-exempted individual who fails to maintain a minimum level of insurance shall pay a monthly penalty for so long as he fails to do so. 26 U.S.C.A. [read post]