Search for: "Long v. Frank" Results 401 - 420 of 1,761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2022, 1:11 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
While I don’t have a great deal of confidence in Congress, I think that there would be strong bipartisan support to retain the CFPB and most, if not all, of its regs and enforcement actions, as long as Dodd-Frank is amended to require funding by Congressional appropriations and governance by a 5-member Board of Directors instead of a single director. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:31 am
Posted by Kevin Harnisch (Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP) and David Ho and Nepomuk Loesti (American International Group, Inc.), on Friday, March 6, 2020 Tags: Extraterritoriality, Foreign issuers, International governance, Liability standards, Morrison v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 3:57 am by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Vicarious liability for clergy abuse in Australia: Bird" in Law & Religion UK, 12 April 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/04/12/vicarious-liability-for-clergy-abuse-in-australia-bird/ [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm by INFORRM
  It probably only reflects the position as it would have been found to exist at common law (see Vassiliev v Frank Cass & Co Ltd [2003] EWHC 1428 (QB) – in which qualified privilege was found partly on the basis of the journal having an “exclusive readership”). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Dufficy’s legal analysis beginning at page 6 of his decision includes an excellent review of the statutory standard and interpretative case law governing dissolution of LLCs, citing familiar cases such as 1545 Ocean Avenue, Doyle v Icon, and (pardon the self-promotion) a couple of cases I litigated and won (Natanel v Cohen and Sieni v Jamsfab, LLC). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Lozinski Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven Epstein, and Warren S. de Wied, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Thursday, April 25, 2019 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, MFW, Supreme Court [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN1] In sum, because the employment agreements appear to have given petitioner a "free hand in determining when and for how long [he] would work" (Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d at 269), the Comptroller's determination excluding petitioner's overtime payments from his final average salary is reasonable, supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Shames v Regan, 132 AD2d at 745; Matter of Mowry v… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN1] In sum, because the employment agreements appear to have given petitioner a "free hand in determining when and for how long [he] would work" (Matter of Murray v Levitt, 47 AD2d at 269), the Comptroller's determination excluding petitioner's overtime payments from his final average salary is reasonable, supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Shames v Regan, 132 AD2d at 745; Matter of Mowry v… [read post]