Search for: "MARCUS v. STATE" Results 401 - 420 of 759
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am by Florian Mueller
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Supreme Court, in the case of Burrage v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:12 pm by Douglas
Com o fim da Segunda Grande Guerra, expande-se o Estado de Bem-Estar Social na Europa e owelfare state nos EUA, que tinham por objetivo fundamental, dentre outros na área econômica, a diminuição da desigualdade social e da precária condição de vida dos pobres por meio de programas assistencialistas executados pelos agentes da mão esquerda do Estado[1]. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:12 pm by Douglas
Com o fim da Segunda Grande Guerra, expande-se o Estado de Bem-Estar Social na Europa e owelfare state nos EUA, que tinham por objetivo fundamental, dentre outros na área econômica, a diminuição da desigualdade social e da precária condição de vida dos pobres por meio de programas assistencialistas executados pelos agentes da mão esquerda do Estado[1]. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
The other panel members are attorneys Tom Killeen (Farrell Fritz) and Russell Stern (Silverman Acampora) and business appraiser Mark Warshavsky (Gettry Marcus). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Rehnquist Center Director Sally Rider Marcus argued that Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Rehnquist Center Director Sally Rider Marcus argued that Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
The Third Circuit vacated and remanded for consideration of Rule 23’s class definition, ascertainability, and numerosity requirements in light of its recent decision of Marcus v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:29 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2011 Heard: June 26, 2012 Decided: May 14, 2013 Docket No. 11-5113-cv(L), 12-491-cv(XAP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, THE VULCAN SOCIETY, INC., MARCUS HAYWOOD, CANDIDO NUNEZ, ROGER GREGG, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. [read post]