Search for: "MARRIAGE OF LAWRENCE"
Results 401 - 420
of 894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Mayefsky and Lawrence B. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:55 pm
Notice how Kennedy's Hobby Lobby opinion tracks what he wrote in Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Today, Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Based on the quadrilogy of animus decisions from the Court dealing with everything from “hippie” communes to federal marriage policy (Moreno, Cleburne, Romer, and Windsor, plus parts of Lawrence), the outlines of a methodology have begun to emerge. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
” The majority found that the Supreme Court’s decisions in Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
Specifically, the majority placed heavy reliance on both Windsor and Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 12:30 am
The first is a review by Edmund White of three books on marriage equality: Jo Becker's Forcing the Spring: Inside the Fight for Marriage Equality (Penguin), David Boies and Theodore B. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:11 am
Lawrence’s 1928 novel Lady Chatterley’s Lover, which had long been banned for its graphic sex scenes. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:34 pm
Lawrence knows full well that under Episcopal Church law, that he swore to uphold in 2008, all local properties are held in trust for the Episcopal Church and her diocese. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:29 am
As he himself appears to recognize, Mark Lawrence eventually was forced, by the course of events leading toward same-sex marriage in ECUSA, to choose between "the doctrine, discipline, and worship of this Church" and "the doctrine, discipline, and worship of Christ as this Church has received it" (my bold emphasis).And from whom did this Church receive the doctrine, discipline and worship of Christ? [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
A state may not deny the issuance of a marriage license to two persons, or refuse to recognize their marriage, based solely upon the sex of the persons in the marriage union. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:16 pm
I wonder, for example, if Justice Scalia would change some of his rhetoric in Lawrence and Windsor about the logic of those opinions requiring same-sex marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am
Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that the Court “is on track to at least partly dispel the impression that it’s pro-business. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:49 am
” Lawrence. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
” Vanderbilt’s father made a huge fuss, and the marriage did go sour. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:55 am
A marriage involves certain promises, including fidelity. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:28 am
(See Lawrence v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm
As recently as 2003, when the Supreme Court invalidated a state law forbidding same-sex sodomy in Lawrence v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Justice Kennedy’s opinion reads much like his opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:31 am
This decision now clears the way for the main case, brought by Bishop Lawrence and his parishes, to go to trial before Judge Goodstein, starting this July.So as always in litigation, we have a mixed bag, and nothing is quite final. [read post]
