Search for: "MARRIAGE OF STEVENS"
Results 401 - 420
of 924
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2015, 11:42 am
It was disputed whether in November 2010 the husband had consulted Steven J. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:49 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie describes a “tack some states are taking to dull the sting of a Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage” – casting the issue “as a matter of religious conscience” – and concludes that it is “less obviously a losing strategy. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm
History (Jan. 2015), by Steven W. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
” At Big Think, Steven Mazie considers whether, if the Court were to strike down state bans on same-sex marriage, a state court judge could ignore that decision. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:53 pm
Finally, Orin suggests that my reliance on Steven Calabresi’s and Julia Rickert’s extensive historical evidence that the Fourteenth Amendment restricts sex discrimination has “a missing argument for how that principle (assuming that the history there is correct, which I don’t know) applies to marriage laws. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:50 am
They include Randy Barnett, Jack Balkin, and Steven Calabresi, among others. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 11:20 pm
In his essay posted on SSRN, Steven Calabresi’s primary originalist case for a right to same-sex marriage runs something like this. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, the lawyers defending the state same-sex marriage bans have some hope of persuading a majority of Justices that while marriage is a fundamental right, its scope is not so broad as to include same-sex marriage. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, the lawyers defending the state same-sex marriage bans have some hope of persuading a majority of Justices that while marriage is a fundamental right, its scope is not so broad as to include same-sex marriage. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:55 pm
” The class legislation argument that Eskridge endorses is similar to the originalist argument for a right to same-sex marriage recently articulated by leading conservative originalist scholar Steven Calabresi, and (more tentatively) by Ramsey. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm
Below are items of potential interest to LHB readers: The Center for the Study of Law and Society (credit)Monday, February 9 - Kaaryn GustafsonProfessor of Law, UC Irvine Law School "The Legal Manufacturing of Hardworking Bastards: Marriage, Bastardy, Apprenticeship, and the Policing of Race and Labor in North Carolina, 1741-1870"Monday, March 9 - Steven WilfProfessor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law "(Re)-Contextualizing… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Coincidentally, on Tuesday retired Justice John Paul Stevens criticized the Citizens United decision in an appearance in Florida; coverage comes from Jeff Schweers of the Gainesville Sun. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Its only foes on the Court were the arch-conservative Justice Rehnquist, and Justice Stevens, who at the time was seen as a moderate. 3. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
” In the Tampa Tribune, Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the Court’s recent announcement that it will review the constitutionality of state bans on same-sex marriage; arguing that because “the Constitution guarantees the right to equal treatment for all, especially when it comes to something as fundamental as marriage, the court should uphold the right of gay and lesbian couples to marry. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upholding four states’ bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
" [Texas Tribune] https://www.scribd.com/doc/252991700/Indictment-U-S-v-Steven-Metro [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:56 pm
The Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisis by Steven J. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
McClain, Micah Schwartzman and Steven D. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:46 am
As Steven Smith tells it, the “new originalism” has made a disastrous Faustian bargain, with Jack Balkin playing Mephistopheles. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie asks “who is to say how ambiguous the law really is, or how ‘reasonable’ the officer’s mistake might be? [read post]
