Search for: "MATTER OF A B"
Results 401 - 420
of 40,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2010, 4:54 am
Like its federal counterpart, Maine Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's... [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the jury's deliberations, or... [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:12 pm
Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the jury's deliberations, or on any juror's mind or... [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:59 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the... [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:50 pm
Somewhat similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the jury's deliberations,... [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:35 pm
SImilar to its federal counterpart, Arkansas Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm
In the Matter of A-B- the government disqualified domestic violence claims as a basis of asylum except on narrow grounds. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 8:54 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(5) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A record that: (A) is on a matter the witness once knew about but now cannot recall well enough to testify fully and accurately; (B) was... [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 6:06 am
Under Texas' version of the anti-jury impeachment rule, Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b), Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of... [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm
On July 18, 2018, in the case In the Matter of Estate of Lois B. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:24 am
LARRY B. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:33 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Tennessee Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:51 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(5) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A record that: (A) is on a matter the witness once knew about but now cannot recall well enough to testify fully and accurately; (B) was... [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:05 am
A District of Columbia Hearing Committee has approved a consent sanction of a stayed 30-day suspension for a conflict of interest in a criminal matter the Petition states that Respondent violated Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7(b)(4), in that without her... [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:53 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the... [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
Matter of Taylor, 57 N.C.App. 213 (1982). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:48 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced a Deferred Subject Matter Eligibility Response Pilot Program (the “DSMER Program”). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:48 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced a Deferred Subject Matter Eligibility Response Pilot Program (the “DSMER Program”). [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:37 am
The Lord Ordinary should also have considered the matters under s 84 (5)(b). [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
In the Matter of Claudia B. v Darren M., the New York appellate Court recounts how the Petitioner (donor) and Respondent (Claudia B.) dated for a few months in 2009. [read post]
