Search for: "MATTER OF B D C" Results 401 - 420 of 8,655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2019, 7:24 am
The Interpretation notes that "� 119.71(c) and (d) only require the chief pilot to be qualified to serve as PIC in at least one aircraft in the certificate holder's operation. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:58 am by David Fraser
(2) An act or conduct is not a violation of privacy if any of the following applies: (a) it is consented to by some person entitled to consent; (b) the act or conduct was incidental to the exercise of a lawful right of defence of person or property; (c) the act or conduct was authorized or required under a law in force in British Columbia, by a court or by any process of a court; (d) the act or conduct was that of (i) a peace officer acting in the course of his or… [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 10:45 am by PaulKostro
Div., A-0180-10T2, December 30, 2011: The time within which relief from a judgment or order pursuant to Rule 4:50-1(d), (e) and (f) must be made is within a reasonable time, and for reasons (a), (b) and (c) not more than one year after the judgment or order was entered. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 12:13 pm by Unknown
(E) A test of the hearing and eyesight of the applicant, and of other matters that may be necessary to determine the applicant’s mental and physical fitness to operate a motor vehicle upon the highways, and whether any grounds exist for refusal of a license under this code. (2) (A) Before a class A or class B driver’s license, or class C driver’s license with a commercial endorsement, may be issued or renewed, the applicant shall have in his or her driver… [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:34 am by Aimee Brown
  The Court concluded that the district court erred in considering the zone-of-interests test a question of subject matter jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court has made clear that it is a merits issue. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 2:13 am by Neil Wilkof
The first question seeks to distinguish this case from C-265/16 VCAST/RTI (Katpost here) and the second question from C-527/15 Stichting Brein (Filmspeler) (Katpost here). [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
Well here's a seldom-used shortcut to victory: a motion for judgment on the pleadings under FRCP 12(c). [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm by Scott McKeown
Ct. at 1373 (“[Section] 314(d) bars review at least of matters ‘closely tied to the application and interpretation of statutes related to’ the institution decision. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
(a) data defining an icon or textual matter alerting a viewer to the availability of information or (b) data enabling access to such an icon or textual matter as may be already stored on said computer; and D iii. data defining said preselected times and said predetermined time increments. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 12:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The appellant was also informed in point 3 of the communication that, in the meantime, however, the Appeal Board had reason to raise the question of whether and to what extent the pilot project allowing a small group of candidates to write the 2019 Papers A, B, C and D on a computer might affect the evaluation of the appellant's paper D such that, in the present appeal, a better grade than "COMPENSABLE FAIL" might be justified. [read post]