Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 401 - 420 of 20,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 1:07 pm by Jon Sands
  Fed R Crim P 35(b) allows a sentence reduction. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:02 am
In the end, it's all really the customer's fault but that doesn't matter because we got rules, and those rule have to be followed.Case In Point  For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, tradeMONSTER (n/k/a Aperture, LLC d/b/a Optio... [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 199 AD2d 393, 394; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b][b][5][iv][D]). [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm by Abigail Slater
Time will tell whether these principles are too much to ask of Internet service providers (ISPs), such as AT&T and Comcast. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am by Leslie Sammis
 [May 29, 2014] PER CURIAM.This matter is before the Court, on the Court’s own motion, forconsideration of amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(Discovery). [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:19 am by Leslie Sammis
 [May 29, 2014] PER CURIAM.This matter is before the Court, on the Court’s own motion, forconsideration of amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(Discovery). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:41 pm by Daniel Schwartz
  However, as a practical matter, if cases don’t have an option of going to a hearing after a reasonable cause finding, it’s going to create one heck of a mess. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:29 am by Steve Baird
We sounded the alarm exactly six months ago about a trademark case of great importance to brand owners: B&B Hardware v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:00 am by Nico Cordes
Since the decision to reject the application only deals with other matters, it appears fitting that the appellant should have a possibility to have its arguments considered at two instances should this be required.This decision T 914/13 (pdf) has European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2017:T091413.20170720. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:22 am by Administrator
”Reich’s criticism cannot be dismissed out of hand, but it is a tricky matter to try to engineer a balance between our various interests by inhibiting an otherwise legitimate mechanism for facilitating collective action. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Since A 100(b) was a matter which had already been decided by the OD, the Board found it suitable not to remit the case only because further opponents had now provided new lines of argumentation within this ground of opposition. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Focusing on defining marks is important b/c multifactor infringement test often zooms back & forth b/t what the mark is in analyzing the different factors. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The fact that in claim 2 now only one herbicide (B) is required only corresponds to the abandonment of part of the claimed subject-matter and does not generate a new subgroup that has not been originally disclosed (see T 615/95 [6]). [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:59 am by Michael C. Dorf
Failure to meet the deadline doesn't disqualify a state's electors, but satisfying it ensures that they will be counted when Congress convenes for that purpose.Why does this error matter? [read post]