Search for: "MATTER OF J M J" Results 401 - 420 of 4,990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2023, 5:50 pm
 Pix Credit here Indonesian Cave Painting dated to 43,900 years agoToday, following the Council’s recommendation, Norges Bank announced its decision to place PT Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk (SIG) under observation pursuant to the ethical guidelines’ criterion concerning “other particularly serious violations of fundamental ethical norms”. [read post]
21 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction Speech act theory will forever be associated with the great J. [read post]
17 May 2023, 10:31 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Hilty, Andrzej Jakubowski, Marie-Christine Janssens, Bernd Justin Jütte, Stavroula Karapapa, Jessica C. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm by Michael Lowe
Drug arrests in Texas that may include other serious charges (like conspiracy or homicide) are known to be fixed upon fentanyl these days; both Texas and federal law enforcement are blatantly targeting fentanyl use as well as its manufacture and distribution. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:01 am by Josh Richman
And it's not so much a matter of accessibility as it is really thinking about what do we need to do to make sure that the technology is useful? [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm by Orin S. Kerr
One of the issues that has come up from time to time is why or whether ex ante restrictions matter. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Defamation actions were undoubtedly a matter of state common law at the founding. [read post]
13 May 2023, 2:19 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Miguel García-Sánchez, Aila M Matanock, & Natalia Garbiras-Díaz, Do Citizens’ Preferences Matter? [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
” At first instance, Meade J held that the Patent was invalid for lack of plausibility and lack of technical contribution over the prior art. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Directors as a matter of course should have robust information about the independence and aims of director nominees before recommending a vote for or against their candidacy.[5]  Once in possession of such information, directors “have a fiduciary duty to disclose to the shareholders the available material facts that would enable them to make an informed decision[.] [read post]