Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 401 - 420 of 2,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus the disclaimer was also necessary for disclaiming subject-matter being excluded from patentability. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:09 pm by Holly Filius
Qualified accounts include 401(k) and 403(b) plans, certain IRA plans, and the like. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:24 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The petition is based on the grounds of A 112a(2)(c) and (d) in combination with R 104(b). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:13 pm by Michelle Ball, Attorney for Students
Many students are suspended or placed up for expulsion for possession of a "knife," pursuant to California Education Code 48900(b). [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:29 am by Jane Meacham, Contributing Editor
Retirement Case Issues A dominant force in 2017 ERISA class action litigation was the filing by the plaintiffs’ class action bar of a wave of new 401(k) and 403(b) fee and investment lawsuits against various employers, with a heavy focus on institutions of higher education. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:29 am by Jane Meacham, Contributing Editor
Retirement Case Issues A dominant force in 2017 ERISA class action litigation was the filing by the plaintiffs’ class action bar of a wave of new 401(k) and 403(b) fee and investment lawsuits against various employers, with a heavy focus on institutions of higher education. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The petitioner explains that it had relied on the admission of MEO2 to the proceedings, whereas the [opponent] argues that the petitioner could have requested a decision on that matter, which it had not done. [2] However, the [opponent] has qualified its statement at a later time in such a way that the dispute between the parties is in large part irrelevant. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 6:06 am by John Jascob
(See, e.g., the Wolters Kluwer publication Loss, Seligman, and Paredes, Securities Regulation, Section 6.B.1., n. 29.) [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT June 27, 2008 THOMAS K. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, this wording does not exclude that there may be further components, such as builder substances that are not water-soluble.[2.5] Examples A to D of document D4, which were cited by the [opponent] define laundry detergent or cleaning compositions which are within the scope of claim 1 of the impugned patent and which further comprise the builder substance zeolite, which is not water-soluble. [2.6] Therefore, in view of the above considerations, the claimed… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This applies all the more if the unclear feature is essential with respect to the invention in the sense that it is designed for delimiting the subject-matter claimed from the prior art, thereby giving rise to uncertainty as to whether or not the subject-matter claimed is anticipated. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 4:13 am by Broc Romanek
Here are the latest failures: - Nabors Industries - Form 8-K (33%; also failed in 2012 with 25% and in 2011 with 42%) - OpenTable - Form 8-K (47%) - Big Lots - Form 8-K (31%; also failed in 2012 with 31%) - East West Bancorp - Form 8-K (42%) - Tutor Perini - Form 8-K (38%; a 3-peat with 38% in 2012, 49% in 2011) - The Children's Place Retail Stores - Form 8-K (17%) - Gleacher & Company - Form 8-K (39%) - Insite Vision -… [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 2:48 am by Liz Dunshee
John responded: I don’t think there’s ever been a hard and fast rule regarding the date of an individual’s signature on a 10-K or 10-Q filing. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 12:21 pm
Rule 38(b)(1); A  motion for judgment as a matter of law (a/k/a “directed verdict”) must be filed no later than 28 (not 10) days after entry of judgment. [read post]