Search for: "MATTER OF MEAD" Results 401 - 420 of 555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by Nicolas Round (Bristows)
The judge began with a broad definition: Stated generally the law is clear that patents are directed to those likely to have a real and practical interest in the subject matter of the invention[2]. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am by Dennis Crouch
This point matters because the already-instituted IPR “is governed by its ownpetition and is confined to the claims and grounds challenged in that petition. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:16 am
John Harris of Politico has just asked Jon Huntsman — Jon Meade Huntsman Jr. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 12:52 pm by David Russcol
(Judge Meade, the author, was in the minority of the original three-judge panel, but because enough other Appeals Court judges agreed with him, two senior colleagues joined the panel to vote with him.) [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:06 am by Daithí
(My colleague David Mead also points, in his book The New Law of Peaceful Protest, to the difficulties encountered under the Serious Organised Crime & Police Act (aka SOCPA) along similar lines, but in the case of defining ‘demonstration’). [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:17 am
As Walter Russell Mead put it, “Israel isn’t an underachieving Denmark; it would be more accurate to say that it is an overachieving Turkey or a miraculously liberal and tolerant Lebanon. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:17 am
Donald Meade (NFP) - "Where injury to the property is permanent, the appropriate measure of damages is the difference between the fair market value of the property prior to and after the injury. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:44 am
It doesn't matter as both will get you to your destination, but one may be more fraught with risks. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 12:29 pm by Wells Bennett
 He thinks the prosecution’s proposed action is appropriate, and proposes to clarify matters that Daniels left muddy. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:56 am by Andres
If the matter ever came to before the courts one issue examined would be the nature of any “exacting review” undertaken by MPs into the necessity of extending these powers. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:26 am by Yishai Schwartz
The Open Society Institute seems to think so, and is now seeking documents from the Danish government on the matter. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:30 am by PaulKostro
Super. at 200 (quoting 1 William Meade Fletcher, Fletcher Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations § 41.33, at 652 (perm. ed., rev. vol. 1999)).] [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The administrative state was able to operate before Chevron was decided (and before it was made the basis of a doctrine), and the administrative state will persist no matter how these cases are resolved. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 7:24 am by Ronald Mann
And if it’s ambiguous between those two purposes, I would begin to think, well, maybe they should have the power themselves under Chevron, Meade, or whatever, to decide which to do. [read post]