Search for: "MATTER OF N B" Results 401 - 420 of 5,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2010, 5:15 am by Mandelman
And yes, when you order your copy, or copies from the link below, you help Mandelman Matters at the same time, because as an Amazon Affiliate, we do receive a small percentage of the books sold as a result of p [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 1:17 am
claims to work for B&N developing mobile appsâ€â [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am by Eric
By Eric Goldman In the Matter of the Welfare of: D.L.W., Child, 2012 WL 171412 (Minn. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:35 am
Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 711 F.2d 295, 328 (D.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The plaintiffs thus moved, under Rule 60(b), to have the judgment vacated and have the whole matter remanded for a new trial. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
I was enjoying some siggi's® yogurt, and noticed, just below the trademark name siggi's®, an interesting piece of trivia: "skyr, that's Icelandic for thick yogurt! [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:02 pm by paperstreet
In the widely contested and controversial field of patenting DNA testing for BRCA breast cancer, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held that (a) isolated DNA molecules falls within patentable subject matter under Section 101 because these compositions are created by human intervention which has given the claimed composition “markedly different” or “distinctive” characteristics; (b) the method claims of comparing or analyzing DNA sequences are… [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 6:18 am
Professor Bénédicte Fauvarque-Cosson (Paris II) has delivered the 7th annual 'Walter van Gerven' Lecture, entitled "The Rise of Comparative Law: a Challenge for Legal Education in Europe". [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
., 60 F.4th 73 (4th Cir. 2023), the Court held that, pursuant to section 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, “[a]n insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is sufficiently concerned with, or affected by, the proceedings to be a ‘party in interest’ that can raise objections to a reorganization plan. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
., 60 F.4th 73 (4th Cir. 2023), the Court held that, pursuant to section 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, “[a]n insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is sufficiently concerned with, or affected by, the proceedings to be a ‘party in interest’ that can raise objections to a reorganization plan. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
., 60 F.4th 73 (4th Cir. 2023), the Court held that, pursuant to section 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, “[a]n insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is sufficiently concerned with, or affected by, the proceedings to be a ‘party in interest’ that can raise objections to a reorganization plan. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The court acknowledged that although section. 7806(b) provides that “[n]o inference, implication, or presumption of legislative construction shall be drawn or made by reason of the location or grouping of any particular section or provision or portion of” the Code and that “descriptive matter relating to the contents of * * * [the Code cannot] be given any legal effect”, it had previously held, in Corbalis v. [read post]