Search for: "MATTER OF R T" Results 401 - 420 of 53,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
According to R 111(2) the decisions of the EPO open to appeal shall be reasoned. [2.2] The function of appeal proceedings is to give a judicial decision upon the correctness of an earlier decision taken by a first instance department (see inter alia T 34/90 [headnote 1]). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
It justified this course of action as follows (English translation):“a) There are unjustifiably many auxiliary requests and those requests do not converge towards patentable subject-matter. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:29 am
The Democrats would be doing this to any R president, no matter what their policies, no matter what they did with Twitter, no matter what. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:49 pm by Tessa Shepperson
R v SAI Property Investments Ltd t/a IPS Property Services Reading Magistrates Court, 30 March 2012 This case  is believed to be the first prosecution of a letting agency under the Data Protection Act. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
As a matter of fact, the existing interests (Interessenlage) are the same. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, no “fresh case” should be brought (B. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 1:38 am by Rose Hughes
The Boards of Appeal in both cases rejected this argument, finding that "[o]nly the claims determine the extent of protection" (T 1473/19, r. 3.16).Squaring the circle of claim interpretation (T 0169/20)T 0169/20 directly addresses the issue of claim interpretation. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Such a retroactive identification may also obviate the need for a formal authorisation (see also T 850/96 [3.3]). [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This part is interesting because it shows the type of evidence gathered in witness hearings and what the Board makes of it.Oral disclosureRequest not to hear the witnesses Dr Wallukat and Dr Kunze[30] By an interlocutory decision in accordance with A 117 and R 117 the board decided that it was necessary to hear Dr Wallukat and Dr Kunze as witnesses.[31] The witnesses were summoned in accordance with R 118. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
” (R 29(3) EPC 1973)Such a claim is, as a rule, referred to as independent claim. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 2:20 pm
So, for that matter, has this, alas. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:10 am by Glenn Reynolds
Well, they should be embarrassed, especially as this wasn’t just one isolated incident. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The purpose of the requirement to reason the decision is to enable the appellant and, in case of an appeal, also the Board of Appeal to examine whether the decision could be considered to be justified or not (see T 278/00; T 87/08 and T 1366/05).In the present case the ED decided against the Appellant, that the subject-matter of claim 1 according to the sole then pending request did not involve an inventive step (A 56). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 5:28 am by J. Benjamin Stevens
If you haven’t checked out Rocket Matter (or you haven’t done so in a while), you really owe it to yourself to do so. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am by Roel van Woudenberg
An assignment of the priority rights of the inventors Wang and Zhong to the appellant or the University of Western Ontario had not taken place prior to the filing of the PCT application.The subject-matter of claim 1 (thus) lacked novelty over the disclosure in documents D20 and D21.Considering document D21 as representing the closest prior art, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 lacked an inventive step.The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 2… [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
”  This problem doesn’t require a government solution. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 11:19 am
Michael Watts, Defendant (EDNY Memorandum and Order)Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change to Amend the FINRA Codes of Arbitration Procedure to Increase Arbitrator Chairperson Honoraria and Certain Arbitration Fees (SEC Notice)Ex-President of Ohio Healthcare Management Company Pleads Guilty in $59 Million Check Kiting Scheme Targeting S&T Bank (DOJ Release)Six Defendants Charged in Scheme to Defraud Student Loan Programs of More Than $12 Million (DOJ Release)FINRA Imposes Fine and… [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   Anyone wishing to review a copy of this Opinion may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Paul T. [read post]