Search for: "MAY CONTRACTING, INC." Results 401 - 420 of 15,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2023, 6:57 am by Christopher G. Hill
Graystone Homes, Inc., a summary of the facts and lawsuit(s) are as follows:  Water leaks developed after the home was built. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Cherie Owen
    The post May 2023 Bid Protest Sustain of the Month appeared first on Government Contracts Legal Forum. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 12:05 pm by Geoff Schweller
Under the FCA’s qui tam provisions, whistleblowers with knowledge of government contracting fraud may file lawsuits on behalf of the U.S. government. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm by Geoff R. Hall
The Court of Appeal applied the interrelated contracts principle, holding that “[t]he contours of the exact bargain between the parties may sometimes require consideration of more than one contract”. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 12:01 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
After negotiating new contract terms, a new agreement (“Agreement”) was apparently entered into on or about May 18, 2018. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:18 am by Leiza Dolghih
It entered into a contract with SCA Promotions, Inc., which provides risk management for marketing and prize promotions. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:10 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AS EXCEPTION TO THE AMERICAN RULE  A party may recover reasonable attorney's fees if its claim is for "an oral or written contract." [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 11:58 am
Filed: June 13, 2017Opinion by: Diana Gribbon Motz, Circuit Judge Holding:            When reviewing a contract providing for a non-qualified stock option to purchase shares of common stock, Defendant corporation's argument that the contract only promised to issue options in the future was without merit because the prevention doctrine provides, "if a promisor prevents or hinders fulfillment of a condition to his performance, the condition… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:45 am by drdiekman
Students should note that a contracting party may be charged with a separate tort liability arising from a breach of a duty distinct from, or in addition to, the breach of contract. [read post]