Search for: "MGN" Results 401 - 420 of 542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am by Kelly
(IP Dragon) China cracks down on software piracy (PlagiarismToday) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules wrongful use of AdWord will infringe trade mark (Class 46) Europe EPO and Google partner up on patent translations (Inovia IP) (IPKat) (IP Osgoode) L’Oréal v eBay: What the Advocate General says (IPKat) Rapidshare hit with Euro 150,000 fine (PlagiarismToday) France Google loses French trademark appeal against Luteciel and Viaticum (Ron Coleman’s LIKELIHOOD OF… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The obiter view was expressed that, by contrast with the view of Mr Justice Bean in Cooke v MGN, the time at which the threshold must be surmounted was at the time when serious harm is determined rather than when the claim was issued. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
MGN Ltd and Associated Newspapers also intervened in support of that application. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2015, the Crown Prosecution Service issued a statement concerning its re-review of Operation Elveden cases. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The obiter view was expressed that, by contrast with the view of Mr Justice Bean in Cooke v MGN, the time at which the threshold must be surmounted was at the time when serious harm is determined rather than when the claim was issued. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
’ Keith Mathieson [2012] 23 Ent LR 14-17 ‘New Guidance on Best Practice in Interim Applications to Restrain the Publication of Information’, Brid Jordan [2012] 23 Ent LR 1-4 ‘The Public Interest in Press Intrusion into the Private Lives of Celebrities: The Decision in Ferdinand v MGN Ltd’, Steve Foster, Communications Law, Vol.16 No.4, 2011 129-134 ‘Twitter Undermines Superinjunctions’, Ursula Smartt, Communications Law, Vol.16 No.4, 2011… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Notwithstanding that the words ‘with a view to publication’ are specifically used in the DPA, the Court of Appeal in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 held that this exemption applies to the media both before and after publication. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am by Cyberleagle
Most intriguingly, somewhere on the journey from Campbell v MGN to the draft Online Safety Bill, ‘Reasonable’ has been jettisoned. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am by INFORRM
  Subsequently, in John v MGN Ltd ([1995] EWCA Civ 23) the Court of Appeal broke decisively with the traditional practice and held that a jury could properly be referred to awards in personal injury cases. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 8 March 2023 there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Various Claimants v MGN before Fancourt J. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
On 10 November 2011 MGN Newspapers said it regretted publishing an article about Dale Farm resident Kathleen McCarthy and apologised for the damage and distress caused. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week saw the conclusion of the widely-reported “WAGatha Christie” libel trial between Rebekah Vardy and Colleen Rooney. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The trial in the case of Various Claimants v MGN continued before Fancourt J. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 23 October 2018 the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in ABC v Telegraph Media Group [2018] EWCA Civ 2329. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Even these trials – which often tend to reduce costs overall, and are usually short hearings in themselves – may routinely give rise to costs of £25,000 per side (Price v MGN [2019] 1 WLR 1464). [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
We have also already mentioned the judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN ([2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch)) which was handed down on 21 May 2015. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 9 October 2023 Johnson J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:16 am by INFORRM
Our right to free expression has a natural tension with our right to privacy – see Von Hannover, Campbell v MGN or Mosley v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  Following Cooke & Anor v MGN Ltd & Anor [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB) (see our blog here), handed down in the summer of 2014, one could have been forgiven for thinking that the tort was facing an existential crisis. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned there was a hearing on 10 June 2015 before Mann J in the Mirror phone hacking case of Gulati v MGN at which permission to appeal was refused. [read post]