Search for: "MICHAEL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 401 - 420 of 1,369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm by George Conway
In 1978, the question was expressly put to the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:08 am by Victoria Clark
  In January of 2018, Aditya Bamzai argued before the Supreme Court as an amicus curiae in Ortiz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am by Mark Walsh
Getting back to October Term 2015, Roberts announces that Justice Elena Kagan has the opinion of the Court in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am by mjpetro
Justice Department lawyers, working with their English counterparts, sought his extradition to the United States to stand trial. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:25 am
Transportation Secretary Calls for New Lobbying Rules "Under scrutiny for his department's interactions with Toyota officials, U.S. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
Before ruling, the court should consider calling for the views of the Department of Justice. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am by Garrett Hinck
Kahn posted the Justice Department’s brief opposing the cert petition in Bahlul v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
Vu has served as a deputy attorney general at the California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General since 2014. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Department of Justice to delay trial in the litigation. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also held 5-4 on Friday in Currier v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that after switching sides to now assert that “some federal prisoners serving longer prison terms than the law allowed [are not] entitled to challenge their sentences in court,” the Justice Department “urged the Supreme Court to deny review in McCarthan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:55 pm
Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, discuss minimum price agreements and Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am by James Romoser
In an article published by the Federalist Society, Michael Bindas anticipates how yet another recent blockbuster — Espinoza v. [read post]