Search for: "MOHAMMED v. US " Results 401 - 420 of 666
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2012, 5:27 am by Benjamin Wittes
Jonathan Witmer-Rich sends in the following commentary on the Amawi case, which I posted yesterday: Just wanted to offer a bit of commentary on U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 5:27 am by Benjamin Wittes
Jonathan Witmer-Rich sends in the following commentary on the Amawi case, which I posted yesterday: Just wanted to offer a bit of commentary on U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:41 am by Wells Bennett
  The Government does not contend, for example, that the right to habeas review recognized in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Jessica Dorsey
The New International Law Blog offers more commentary on the latest ICJ decision in Belgium v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by INFORRM
The victory of the defendant, “Nature” magazine in the libel case brought by Professor Mohammed El-Naschie ([2012] EWHC1809 (QB)) was widely reported. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:34 am by Westminster Law Library
.), by the name of the detainee mentioned (Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Jose Padilla, etc.), by the method of torture used, and the type of document (email, interview, memo, etc.) [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:01 pm by Julian Ku
(After all, the Court unanimously dismissed the TVPA claim in Mohamed v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:32 am by Wells Bennett
The latest statement from the defense in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:09 am by Rosalind English
Sumption compares the incremental promotion of press interest and pressure group litigation with the “much tighter standing rules” in the US, linking the latter with the fact that the US is now a far mightier power than this country,  along with the robust immunity of the US executive’s foreign policy decisions from judicial scrutiny. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Justice Altamas KabirSupreme Court of IndiaIn a judgment that could have far reaching consequences, the Supreme Court in Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am by Benjamin Wittes
The standard for removal and subsequent trial in absentia in both federal and U.S. military courts is Illinois v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
He speaks to that briefly, and turns, at long last, to the arraignment of the accused in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]