Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 401 - 420
of 895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2017, 7:51 am
A reporter asked me recently how Secretary Mnuchin could possibly have the time to manage the CFPB on top of his main job of being Treasury Secretary. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
In other words, whilst the question of validity of an EU law is not a matter for a national court to decide the application itself can be rejected if the national court considers that there are no grounds for saying that an EU law is invalid.While it is open to a court to refer questions on the validity of EU law when considering the kind of legal conclusion the national court is entitled to reach (see R (Telephonica 02 Europe PLC) v Secretary of State for… [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
For the convenience of readers, I reiterate from previous postings that Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
The film Proof of Life is not just a compelling narrative – its premise and main character also provide some useful insights into managing the emerging threat of ransomware. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:28 am
” Transpolymer Industries, Inc. v Chapel Main Corp., 582 A2d 936 [Del . [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
Lord Wilson gave the main judgment and Lord Carnwath provided an alternative basis for allowing the appeals. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
There are some paragraphs of a general nature on a local authority’s responsibilities when considering or arranging out of borough (or more distant) temporary accommodation, drawing on the Supreme Court judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening) [2015] UKSC 22 (our report). [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
The Supreme Court held that the Appeal Court had not applied the correct test from R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which for threats from third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:36 am
In doing this I cannot see how the Secretary of State has acted for a pensions’ purpose. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
They lost on their main challenge to the compatibility of the rules with the HRA and judicial review principles, the court holding that in general it is the decision in an individual case which may be incompatible with ECHR rights, rather than the relevant general rules or policies (para. 57). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These state owned enterprises (SOEs) operate where state duty and enterprise responsibility meet. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:26 am
In Runions v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
The ACLU’s main points track its brief. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
App. 2006); United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:47 am
The Supreme Court in the UK has given its decision in the conjoined cases of Essop v Home Office (UK Border Agency) and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, concerning indirect discrimination. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 1:51 pm
Development and implementation of an accompanying communication strategy; V. [read post]
