Search for: "Major C. Davis"
Results 401 - 420
of 735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
Major Davis clearly was, and fits that statutory definition of employer. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:28 am
First and foremost, an overwhelming majority of employees of federal contractors, especially construction contractors, have wages regulated by the Davis Bacon act. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:14 am
” See Correspondence from Jacqueline C. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:26 pm
While the SEC finally did implement the lifting of the ban on general solicitation by creating the new Rule 506(c), it also has proposed new onerous rules governing its use (as well as the use of the existing Rule 506(b)). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:26 pm
While the SEC finally did implement the lifting of the ban on general solicitation by creating the new Rule 506(c), it also has proposed new onerous rules governing its use (as well as the use of the existing Rule 506(b)). [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
(c).) [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:19 am
Federal Contractor Minimum Wage Applies to Four Categories of Contracts Under the Executive Order, the new minimum wage for federal contractor employees reaches four major categories of federal contracts: Procurement contracts for construction covered by the Davis-Bacon Act (DBA); Service contracts exceeding $2,500 that are subject to the Service Contract Act (SCA); Concessions contracts where the contractor uses federal property (e.g., land or facilities), such… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:39 pm
Contractual Arrangements Covered In general, there are four major categories of contractual agreements that will be subject to the minimum wage requirement: procurement contracts for construction covered by the Davis-Bacon Act (DBA). [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:01 pm
Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:58 pm
Then I read what James C. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
[xxviii] C. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
While “valid license” in Section 40-11-370(C) may be unambiguous, that term had never been addressed before by the Court, and the cases referenced by the Majority did not address that provision. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
While “valid license” in Section 40-11-370(C) may be unambiguous, that term had never been addressed before by the Court, and the cases referenced by the Majority did not address that provision. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:23 pm
A+ may turn out to be the most useful of the three major new exemptions under the JOBS Act (the other two being Rule 506(c) and crowdfunding). [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:23 pm
A+ may turn out to be the most useful of the three major new exemptions under the JOBS Act (the other two being Rule 506(c) and crowdfunding). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
The majority viewpoint is that under the learned intermediary rule drug manufacturers are not liable for failure to directly warn patients of risks and side effects. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:19 pm
Having major cultural figures join the fight will greatly increase our chances of overcoming Wall Street’s opposition. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:10 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:42 pm
Davie — This article is for general information only. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:42 pm
Davie — This article is for general information only. [read post]
