Search for: "Major v. Social Security Administration" Results 401 - 420 of 1,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Hawaii only allows carry by security guards on duty. [read post]
Although more tailored access comes with increased costs and administrative burdens, companies that adopt this practice may not only preserve a CFAA claim when an employee accesses the information anyway, but may also increase overall system security consistent with industry best practices. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In keeping with President Obama’s announced agenda, the EEOC has made disability and other discrimination regulations and enforcement a major priority. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 6:53 am by Supreme People's Court Observer
Case three, Wang Zongli v. the Tianjin Heping District Real Estate Administration Bureau (Tianjin Bureau), relating to a major social issue, the expropriation of real property and compensation of owners. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 5:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In a new decision in Simcoe Muskoka Child and Youth Family Services v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
It also puts users’ privacy and security (including minors’!) [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:58 pm by Amy Howe
Instead, Gorsuch pointed to less powerful individuals who may be affected by the actions of federal agencies, such as immigrants, veterans seeking benefits, and Social Security claimants. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:10 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
Nature of PPP agreements There are two schools of thought on the nature of PPP agreements, administrative v. civil agreements. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm by Kevin Johnson
Before the Supreme Court, the Obama administration took a firm position and relied heavily on two Cold-War-era decisions that immigration law professors love to hate: Knauff v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am by Rosalind English
The cases The appellants in the two English cases had failed in appeals to the social security and child support and the immigration and asylum chambers of the First-tier Tribunal respectively and had been refused permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal by both the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
The timing suggested that the employer may have investigated its employees’ immigration status because it was unhappy with the results of a union election; as the majority opinion, written by Judge David Tatel, noted, “the company claimed that after the election it put the Social Security numbers given by all the voting employees into the Social Security Administration’s online database and discovered that most of the numbers… [read post]