Search for: "Mann v Does" Results 401 - 420 of 551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
On 17 November 2010, Mann J held that Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on the PSI ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:01 pm
"On November 21, 2007, the Supreme Court of Georgia held Georgia's sex offender residency restrictions unconstitutional in Mann v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has coverage as does INFORRM. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 3:42 am
A bit of luck for Tubes perhaps - but more of a wait for both parties while the previous round of the litigation is repeated.Regular users of the Cancellation Division and Boards of Appeal will also know that they regularly decline to deal with all the arguments put, even when expressly asked by a party to do so: see Julius Sämann Ltd v Jees SRO, ICD 3630. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
 In the same way that life imitates art, so too does litigation. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:09 am by Rosalind English
But it is not true that, as Rozenberg says, “there is nothing in it to suggest that he does not support the direction of travel. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
Hakim does not add to the latter list, the court specifically noting that an identification from a showup conducted within a very short time after the crime is much more likely to be valid… In State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 18 and 22 January 2016 Mann J heard the applications in the News Group phone hacking litigation, Various v NGN. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court's ruling in Maples v. [read post]