Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 401 - 420
of 34,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
[www.markschwab.us][www.markschwab.us]ny-821133 No. 08-13435-P _____________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _____________________________ MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 4:11 am
" Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
Dreamwell, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:23 pm
In One Group LLC v Gouverneur Inc, the FCA reviewed the Registrar’s decision not to expunge One Group LLC’s (“One Group”) trade-mark registration for STK (the “Mark”) on the basis of non-use, as well as the subsequent Federal Court (“FC”) decision to overturn the Registrar’s ruling. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
World Champ Tech LLC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:47 am
Blacklight Power v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks Chancery Division “The correct standard of proof for establishing patentability was the balance of probabilities. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
On 7 October 2015 the Supreme Court heard the case of Marks and Spencer plc v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:48 am
Secondly, the Court adopted an approach similar to that of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Specsavers v Asdasaga. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:55 am
The decision of the Court of Appeal in the UK in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd is important in this respect and relates to parallel importing of pharmaceutical products within the EU. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:50 am
Promote v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:31 am
Cold War Museum v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:31 am
Cold War Museum v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:39 pm
Specifically, not only must the examiners stably and accountably balance the relationship between ‘the case-by-case approach’ and ‘the uniform standards basis’ in every single case, but they are also likely to receive many questions from the public with regard to, in essence, stare decisis v. the multifactor test. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:15 am
Express Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:18 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 11 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc [2014] UKSC 11 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:22 am
Promote Innovation LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:33 am
Ahold Licensing SA v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm
The following is excerpted from an August 31, 2010 Morgan Lewis Intellectual Property LawFlash: Earlier today, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of the relator's claims in Stauffer v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
More details of China Healthways Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
