Search for: "Mark v. Wish" Results 401 - 420 of 2,169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2020, 3:32 am by Sophie Corke
The (supposed) test The leading case on professional advisors’ potential conflict of interest is Bolkiah v KPMG [1999] 2 AC 222¸where professional advisors (in an analogous position to solicitors) formerly acted for an applicant who then wished to restrain them from acting for its opponent. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm by Marty Lederman
Kennedy, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, this year I also assigned two other readings:  a 1998 article co-written by Amy V. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
The state argues that White has repeatedly indicated that he does not wish to pursue an Atkins claim. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Mark A. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
We wish to offer a few general remarks on some themes at the heart of the project: the idea of cycles in politics, and of different modalities (“time”), whether progression (in a “linear” fashion or otherwise) and repetition (albeit “rhyming” not repeating, to follow Jack following Mark Twain – and, more recently, Seamus Heaney and Joe Biden.) [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 Ginsburg also made her mark on intellectual property law, from patent law decisions such as Microsoft Corp v AT&T, to copyright in Eldred v Ashcroft. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
”  And Jack presents good reason to believe that we are indeed in such a situation, where we live far more in an “oligarchy” where money not only talks but screams with delight as the wishes of the donor class are translated into concrete political victories. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Brown, The "Principal Purpose" Driven Life: How Hospitals Should Apply ERISA's Church Plan Exemption after Advocate v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm by Alex Woolgar
Leaving aside the rather predictable (given the team's public dilation on the issue of a potential name change) instance of trade mark squatting, most of the IP interest came from proceedings in the TTAB and the District Court of Virginia, and the subsequent ruling of the Supreme Court in Matal v Tam. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
The same Judiciary Committee that marked up this bill considered an article of impeachment based on bribery against President Trump. [read post]