Search for: "Markes v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 10,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm by Old Fox
Any opposition battle for KYLIE in Australia would be more heavily weighed in Ms Minogue's favour than in the United States, in light of both existing trade marks, and reputation and use. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 5:18 pm by Will Baude
As predicted, the United States has filed a cert petition and stay application in Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm by Rebecca Tapscott
On October 27, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) in Corcamore, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm by Orin Kerr
The delay question came up in passing in Footnote 3 of United States v. [read post]
By: Mark Stepanyuk The United States led the world in internet usage throughout the 1990s and “[a]t the time of the Dot-com-crash less than 7% of the world was online. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” By “neo-Garrisonians,” I refer to those historians whose historical work unblinkingly examines the racist past of the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
Mayorkas "Plaintiff Mark Bristow, a United States citizen, has filed a Form I-130 petition for an immigrant visa on behalf of his husband, Plaintiff Felixberto Tinga Villamil II. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:31 pm by Gene Quinn
On September 3, 2010, IHOP IP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the owner of various IHOP registered trademarks in the United States, sued the International House of Prayer alleging various trademark infringement theories. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:37 am by Ken
Today, as CNN reported, the United States Supreme Court rejected cert in the case Bogani Charles Calhoun v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am by Sander Gelsing
’s rights in the famous mark BARBIE were not enough to for our Supreme Court to find a likelihood of confusion with a restaurant operating under the name Barbie’s (Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22). [read post]