Search for: "Martinez v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2022, 7:44 am
” Plus, the district court had reexamined other parts of the claim when the case was remanded for further proceedings in light of Martinez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
Finally, in State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:37 pm
United States 15-8544Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm
The question newly added in the petition is a sequel to the Court’s ruling two years ago in the case of Martinez v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:06 pm
Roger Murray v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:02 pm
The Supreme Court subsequently held, in Martinez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:46 am
And unlike Martinez and the subsequent decision in Trevino v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 5:55 am
Guzman-Martinez v Rosado 2025 NY Slip Op 01483 Decided on March 14, 2025Appellate Division, Fourth Department makes a bold statement on the question of whether an attorney who is hired after the time to serve notice of an injury pursuant to General Municipal Law 50-e has passed can still be held responsible for failing to move for leave to file a late notice of claim under section 50-e(5). [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
In reaching this conclusion, we adopted reasoning from Martinez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
In reaching this conclusion, we adopted reasoning from Martinez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:52 pm
Martinez, 296 Ill. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
Trial Court: Cause No. 2016-27737; Martinez Partners, LLP v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:45 pm
Ramirez v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
Also: Seth Barrett Tilman's brief in LeBrant v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:42 am
Martinez (state university funding of religious group). [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:14 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 9:37 am
In Matter of Romero v Martinez, 280 AD2d 58 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 721 [2001], the First Department found that a NYC Housing Authority resident may have continued occupancy conditioned on the "permanent exclusion" of a dangerous individual, which can include a prohibition on visitation. [read post]
