Search for: "Matter of B M and P M" Results 401 - 420 of 1,597
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Briefly put, the statute repeats parts of the common law definition of defamation, see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 559, comment b, which the Alaska Supreme Court in Gottschalk v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 5:58 am
With thanks to Alexander de Leeuw for part 2 of his report: With the first day of the IP seminar at Volvo Cars in the rear view mirror, participants got up early for discussions of litigation trends, big data, SEPs and 5G, IP valuation, and last but not least trademarks and brands in the automotive industry.Litigation trends kick-offVladimir Bud (Darts-IP) had the difficult task of warming up the crowd for another day of IP. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Ron Friedmann
I’m guessing he will talk about the need for T-shaped lawyers. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:11 pm by Richard Hunt
No matter what the Supreme Court might have done it could not have significantly changed that settlement dynamic, for even the most business friendly decision could only give defendants a reasonable chance of success on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
P. 24(b) before the return date of any motion to seal or otherwise restrict public access or to obtain public access to materials or judicial proceedings filed under seal. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:07 pm
Heavy Drinking: The Myth of Alcoholism as a Disease (University of California Press, 1988).Heyman, Gene M. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Civil actions were brought on the exception contained in 440.11(1)(b). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
What’s the difference b/t an inventor and a mechanic? [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The First Department declined to follow the interpretation of the Second Department which held that the ICPC applies to a nonrespondent parent living outside of New York (Matter of Alexus M. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
It all seemed so easy and  matter-of-fact in retrospect, as Rose recalls: When [the whole roasted hog] was done, I served it up. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am by Michael Lowe
From the Guideline, here is the complete Loss Table: (1) If the loss exceeded $6,500, increase the offense level as follows: Loss (apply the greatest) Increase in Level (A) $6,500 or less no increase (B) More than $6,500 add 2 (C) More than $15,000 add 4 (D) More than $40,000 add 6 (E) More than $95,000 add 8 (F) More than $150,000 add 10 (G) More than $250,000 add 12 (H) More than $550,000 add 14 (I) More than $1,500,000 add 16 (J) More than $3,500,000 add 18 (K) More than $9,500,000 add… [read post]