Search for: "Matter of Baxter" Results 401 - 420 of 481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
(The IP Factor)   Japan Japan to sign ACTA this weekend (Michael Geist)   Poland A letter of consent and something more (Class 46)   South East Asia Patent protection in the ASEAN region (Foreign Filing Blog)   Switzerland Acquiescence not a factor in opposition proceedings (Class 46)   United Kingdom Copyright in court judgments: a matter of access (1709 Copyright Blog) SuperGroup: Fashion, recession and IP (IPKat) Damages cap now in place (PatLit) PCC Page 39: The… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 965 S.W.2d 656, 662 (Tex. [read post]
An extensive dissent in De Vita, authored by Justice Arabian and joined by Justice Baxter, would have held general plan amendments per se to be matters of fundamental statewide importance, exhibiting genuine extra-municipal concerns, and requiring multi-disciplinary planning expertise in their legislation – and that therefore they are matters  beyond the local initiative power. [read post]
An extensive dissent in De Vita, authored by Justice Arabian and joined by Justice Baxter, would have held general plan amendments per se to be matters of fundamental statewide importance, exhibiting genuine extra-municipal concerns, and requiring multi-disciplinary planning expertise in their legislation – and that therefore they are matters  beyond the local initiative power. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Summary judgment is appropriate if the movant can show both the absence of genuine issues of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
- bit.ly/wAuPVt (Solomon Banda) Reports and Resources CNSSI-4031 Cryptographic High Value Products (CHVP) (PDF) bit.ly/xHmRPd (Committee on National Security Systems) Microsoft Paper Focuses on Evolved Security, Privacy and Reliability Strategies for Cloud and Big Data – bit.ly/yR2QpG (Scott Charney) New Federal Guidelines Promote Uniform Treatment of eDiscovery in Criminal Proceedings – bit.ly/AjW6sa (Bracewell & Giuliani) New Research Reveals Cyber… [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm by admin
Cheng does not explain why, under his proposed “consensus rule,” subject matter experts are needed at all. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
But in this preliminary, pre-discovery procedural posture, the court declines to rule as a matter of law that it is not. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal and remand the matter for further proceedings, consistent with our opinion, to determine whether the disputed materials should be produced. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:44 am
   If you shoot an arrow in the air, where it lands, not where you intended it to land, is all that matters. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
"For the customer," according to Defendants, "as a practical matter, it was the same as if it never received the source code for the 'locked down' modules and their features at all. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:40 am
Justice Marvin Baxter, writing for the 6-1 court, ruled that enhancements are permissible "where the juvenile proceedings included all the constitutional protections applicable to such matters, even though these protections do not include the right to jury trial. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
Issa suggested that perhaps "one window" might be provided for a post-grant proceeding, one shot at a patent, no matter when that window would be. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:56 am by Legal Beagle
That report and Mr Scott’s comments are located HERE The letter from Mr Ritchie to the Glasgow Bar Association, which is now circulating on the internet is reprinted below in the interests of transparency : Dear Ms Baxter RE:ESTO LAW LTD In my earlier responses to your letters of 13 December 2011 and 11 January 2012, I explained that the Council of the Law Society of Scotland had agreed that my Vice-President Austin Lafferty and I should carry out a review into the concerns that you… [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]