Search for: "Matter of C.J."
Results 401 - 420
of 527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
Rather, the defendant argues that if every statutory "i" is not dotted and "t" is not crossed, the defendant has the absolute right to insist that the lawsuit be not only dismissed but that it be dismissed with prejudice i.e. any deviation, no matter how minor, requires the death penalty. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
" (Guglielmi v Spelling-Goldberg Productions, 25 Cal 3d 860, 869, 603 P2d 454, 460 [1979] (Bird, C.J., concurring) (concurrence endorsed by four of seven Justices).) [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
Gulliver and C.J. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:13 am
Section 14-458.1(a)(1)(d) could also be applied to speech on matters of public concern, such as discussions of an accurate statement that a teacher was having a sexual or romantic relationship with an underage student, or accurate allegations that an underage classmate had sexually assaulted someone. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Its “balancing test” invited judges to weigh “imponderable values,” he said, and required them “to act as legislators, not judges” in assessing the benefit side of the cost-benefit equation.[7]All that mattered under Casey’s undue burden test, the chief justice insisted, was whether a challenged law imposed a substantial obstacle on a woman’s access to an abortion before fetal viability. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
Op. by C.J. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:34 am
Group II.4: Law, Pathology and Politics Chair: Professor Wayne Morrison, Department of Law, Queen Mary, University of London Speaker 1: Herlinde Pauer-Studer, The Role of Morality in Nazi Conceptions of Law Speaker 2: Nicholas Gervassis, History of a Patient: Drafting and the Subconscious of Law in Action Speaker 3: Arudra Burra, Political Neutrality and the Continuity of Law Group II.5: The Relevance of History for Legal Theory Chair: Catharine… [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
But even on the matter of fee proof, appellate dispositions are inconsistent in credit card cases. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
See Pico (Rehnquist, J., dissenting, joined by Burger, C.J., and Powell, [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice H.L. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Chandrachud, C.J. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm
Rankin, 371 N.C. 885, 919, 821 S.E.2d 787 (2018) (Martin, C.J., dissenting)). [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 2:51 pm
(Father), pro se, appeals the orders issued by the Westmoreland County Orphans' Court, which dismissed his petition to terminate the parental rights of C.J. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
Judgment Introduction The judgment of the majority (McLachlin C.J., Abella ,Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Brown JJJ) was given by Abella J. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm
In such circumstances, administrative tribunals may be bound by the requirement of an independent and impartial decision maker, one of the fundamental principles of natural justice: Matsqui, supra (per Lamer C.J. and Sopinka J.) [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
., dissenting) (along with Edwards, C.J., and Wald and Rogers, JJ., joining opinion arguing that intentional sex discrimination is sufficient to justify punitive damage award), rev’d, 527 U.S. 526 (1999). [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Note also that Godoy opinion does not address the matter of contractual choice of law. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Additionally, there is the matter of timing. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Holm, 137 P.3d at 771-72 (Durham, C.J., dissenting) (citing statistics reporting that “of the 42% of Utah residents between the ages of 18 and 64 who were unmarried, 30% to 46% were currently cohabiting outside of marriage”); see also Brown, 947 F. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
LEGAL DOCTRINE DESIGNED BY CITIBANK ATTORNEYS FOR COLLECTION OF DEFAULTED CONSUMER DEBT YIELDS DIVIDENDS AS OTHER TEXAS COURTS OF APPEALS FOLLOW PRECEDENT SET BY DALLAS COURT OF APPEALS IN 2008 What to do when you don't win all of your cases, such as a contract case when you can't find the contract, or some of the essential terms went missing? [read post]
