Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark" Results 401 - 420 of 1,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
Copyright registration is a matter of filling out the right forms and sending in the right fees, and all of the forms are online at the U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
Readers will remember that in Fenty v Arcadia both the High Court and the Court of Appeal noted how image rights as such do not exist in that country [see here].With regard to Italian law, one might consider whether the limitation - confirmed by the Turin court - of the lawfulness of the unauthorized use of one's own image to public interest scenarios is fully compliant with Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:55 am by Deborah Heller
Clark contested that the elements of standing from Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:53 am by Saskia Hayes, CMS
The UK Supreme Court recently handed down its judgment in the matter of Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd [2019] UKSC 6. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
He discussed recent judicial developments relating to the Texas law of intestacy, wills, estate administration, trusts, and other estate planning matters. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
  Lord Kerr SCJ then went on to set out how the Court should approach its determination of meaning, citing Sir Anthony Clarke MR’s well-known guidance in Jeynes v News Magazines Ltd & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 130:- “The governing principle is reasonableness. (2) The hypothetical reasonable reader is not naïve, but he is not unduly suspicious. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
The matter is part heard On 25 to 28 March 2019 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the defamation case of Bull v Desporte. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Panel - Critical Perspectives on Reproductive Health Exceptionalism Moderator: Melissa Alexander, University of Wyoming College of Law Brietta Clark, Loyola Law School Los Angeles, Abortion Exceptionalism and NIFLA Linda Fentiman, Pace University School of Law, Of Mosquitoes and 'Moral Convictions': How Rolling Back the Affordable Care Act's Contraceptive Mandate Jeopardizes Women's and Children's Health Jennifer Oliva, West Virginia University, Gillespie and the… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which… [read post]