Search for: "Matter of Darren S. (Darren S.)"
Results 401 - 420
of 694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2014, 8:27 am
”DeMerchant, who commented on the matter for the first time, described the personal and professional toll the case has taken on her. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
LSUC dismissal of disciplinary proceedings against Beth DeMerchant and Darren Sukonick.The reasons issued by the LSUC for finding Beth DeMerchant and Darren Sukonick had not been in a conflict of interest when representing Hollinger International Inc. and Conrad Black during the sale of Hollinger’s newspaper businesses to CanWest, are not especially interesting as a matter of doctrinal law (the DeMerchant decision is here). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
The reasons for revocation are limited to added subject-matter in respect of granted claim 1 (alternative claims submitted during the hearing by Nestec were not admitted into the proceedings). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:28 pm
This, said the judge, was inappropriate, as those were matters of which he was obliged to form his own view. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:59 am
That’s your [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 4:10 am
Stern says the Law Society’s position was that the lawyers should have obtained a waiver of conflict of interest from an independent director before continuing to act on the matters. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 3:35 pm
[35ZB Section 35ZA deals with enforcement] [35ZC deals with forfeiture in England and Wales or Northern Ireland] [s.35ZD deals with forfeiture in Scotland]" Darren's report attracted a considerable volume of response from readers on both sides, some of which was even publishable. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
It’s been a high profile fall for the Law Society of Upper Canada’s disciplinary system. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
However, that is not the end of the matter. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
Further reading: Darren's blogpost "New Patents Act in New Zealand", 29 August 2013, here A New Patents Act for New Zealand, from Marks & Clerk UK here [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:16 am
Kevin supported the availability of appeals of procedural issues, a point central to developing uniform jurisprudence on procedural matters. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
Intellectual Property and Digital Content, edited by Richard S. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm
Lundbeck A/S [2013] EWCA Civ 924. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 8:58 am
Remarkably, Darren's post attracted over 30 comments from readers, most of them sensible (the comments, that is). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 11:48 am
It is effective as of June 7, 2013 (the date that the governor signed it) and many of its provisions will be valid Florida law in a matter of days (July 1, 2013). [read post]
17 May 2013, 6:09 am
Having considered the matter, for the reasons set forth below, the court will grant California’s motion and remand this matter. [read post]
16 May 2013, 1:03 am
And I suggest it is this that is at the heart of the ‘fallacy’ that Darren is trying to point out.I would urge those following Darren’s posts to read in particular paragraphs 140-157 of the decision. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
But, as always, more pressing matters got in the way. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:59 am
Florida home owners fighting foreclosure, and foreclosure defense attorneys and Florida lawyers helping with short sales for that matter, may need a bit of good news after dealing with the ramifications of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Pino v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
At most it could have suspended the opposition proceedings until a final judgment on the matter was delivered. [read post]
