Search for: "Matter of Held Orders of US West" Results 401 - 420 of 1,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
The revised code comes three years after a public consultation was held on changing the document. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Fourth Circuit encompasses Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia, and its rulings are binding on federal district courts (and state courts) in each of those states.The case arises out of the experience of a transgender boy who seeks to use the boys’ restrooms at his high school. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Defendant informed the probation officer who conducted the presentence investigation that "she received adequate supervision and that the quality of the home was decent" during most of her formative years when she was raised by a grandmother in Jamaica, British West Indies. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:22 pm
  The first was from the European Court of Justice in the West Tankers case. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:52 am by admin
His article has held up well and is worth a read: The Universe of Thinkable Thoughts: Literary Warrant and West’s Key Number System Universal availability. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:49 am by Brian Finucane
In our view, States Parties to the Conventions are under a duty to exercise their moral suasion and influence in order to induce Parties to a conflict to respect the Conventions. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:29 am by Susan Brenner
This post is about a case in which two of those principles were at issue: the requirement that evidence be authenticated in order to be admissible; and the default prohibition on the use of hearsay evidence. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Raja has been ordered to pay £5,000 and a further interim payment on account of costs. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
  Episode description: In attempts to destabilize the West, Russia and its allies have been using migrants as pawns. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The word “intimate” did not have an essentially sexual connotation; the same word was used in the order in McKennitt v Ash [2006] EWCA Civ 1714 where the relationship was not sexual. [read post]